Jump to content

Yo-ho yo-ho, a Pirates Life for Me! - Day 6 is now! - Night 6 starts at 6pm EST


Dome

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, TheKillerNacho said:

@The Orcasummary please

 

4 hours ago, The Orca said:

So...

Swag claims an invest on Malf (in between but strong hint of it)

Touch claims Swag and Mwil are aligned

Squire claims 4 man tricorder invest with at least 1 mutineer between Rags, Matts, Naz, Bcb (Naz was added via a redirect/randomization)

Racks claims to have made Swag untargetable

BcB claims to have tracked Racks and he didnt visit Swag but visited Malf 

Malf claims to have been roleblocked

 

Is this accurate to what has been claimed so far?

 

 

2 hours ago, The Orca said:

So @Malfatron

1. Swag softs that he invested Malf and he is a mutineer (malf claims he was roleblocked)

2. Touch claims to have targeted Swag and Mwil comparing alignments-aligned

3. Racks claims he made Swag untargetable so Touch is lying scum 

4. Bcb claims he tracked Racks and he didnt visit Swag, but actually Malf who was roleblocked so Racks is lying scum

5. Swag then claims roleblock confirming Racks info and painting Bcb as lying scum

Swag and Racks are scum together 100% 

 

 

1 hour ago, The Orca said:

Gut instinct on how they would play the scenario that happened 

Swag lays out a soft like claim that Malf is guilty

Doesnt gain much traction

Malf claims he was roleblocked which Swag and Racks would already known they did 

You claim Swag and Mwil are Aligned

Myself, Pickle and I thought 1 other was pushing Swag 

Mwil was being pushed and going in circles refusing to answer a simple question

Knowing Swag can not flip or it will incriminate Mwil as well they devise a plan where they confirm each others move or was the plan all along

Racks claims he "jailed" Swag making him untargetable 

This in turn would show you are lying and scum...but instead they dont push for your lynch imo...they try to excuse your info as mistaken, wrong mechanic etc

 

 

They are in the clear except Bcb tracked Racks and he didnt visit Swag as he claimed but Malf who was roleblocked

This they also have to explain away cause it is counter to the info they and others posted

So to combat this Swag confirms Racks "jail" by finally claiming oh I was roleblocked as well

Then point the finger at Bcb which Mwil was going for before settling on Matts I believe

So in summation

Swag, Racks, Mwil

 

 

Definitely read though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest problem with rackcs' claim is he seemed to think his "jail" worked differently than Jailers in Dome's previous games...but it's possible Dome simply wrote "Jailer" and he didn't ask and just assumed it worked that way.

I actually believe touch's, bcb's and rackcs' claims.

I think Mwil and Swag may both be scum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...