Tk3 Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 2 minutes ago, SwAg said: I guess you’re out on this one since your math troubles are well documented. I stand by the opinion.. Heres a smaller version of our previous debate There are 10 chests. There are bombs inside 2 random chests It is revealed that there is a bomb in chest 4 To say “it is statistically unlikely that 2 bombs would be next to each other, therefore chests 3 and 5 are safer bets” is a fallacy chests 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10 still have a statistically equal chance of having the bomb, despite the fact that 2 bombs next to each other is less likely than the bombs being separated it’s the same fallacy of thinking there has to be a mafia between numbers 8 and 14 simply because dispersion is more likely than them being bunched 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Tk3 said: I stand by the opinion.. Heres a smaller version of our previous debate There are 10 chests. There are bombs inside 2 random chests It is revealed that there is a bomb in chest 4 To say “it is statistically unlikely that 2 bombs would be next to each other, therefore chests 3 and 5 are safer bets” is a fallacy chests 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10 still have a statistically equal chance of having the bomb, despite the fact that 2 bombs next to each other is less likely than the bombs being separated it’s the same fallacy of thinking there has to be a mafia between numbers 8 and 14 simply because dispersion is more likely than them being bunched agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 @Outpost31 am I allowed to resubmit, given the new information that highest score gets an advantage? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Tk3 said: @Outpost31 am I allowed to resubmit, given the new information that highest score gets an advantage? 8 minutes ago, Outpost31 said: Monster Mayhem is definitely next. The highest scores here will get the best pick of their monster. I will re-tag everyone soon to make this announcement official. Ties will be broken by tiebreaker rounds. I will obviously allow for changes to be made. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 Math yes. reading......no 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 3 minutes ago, Malfatron said: Math yes. reading......no Fair Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrenaline_Flux Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 3 minutes ago, Malfatron said: but why male models Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 8 minutes ago, Tk3 said: I stand by the opinion.. Heres a smaller version of our previous debate There are 10 chests. There are bombs inside 2 random chests It is revealed that there is a bomb in chest 4 To say “it is statistically unlikely that 2 bombs would be next to each other, therefore chests 3 and 5 are safer bets” is a fallacy chests 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10 still have a statistically equal chance of having the bomb, despite the fact that 2 bombs next to each other is less likely than the bombs being separated it’s the same fallacy of thinking there has to be a mafia between numbers 8 and 14 simply because dispersion is more likely than them being bunched That’s literally not the argument. I’m shocked that the intersection of math and reading has left you nothing short of dumbfounded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 You somehow got the principle of the argument right, then randomly created an argument that was never made. That’s nothing short of astonishing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dome Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 Everyone, look at swag struggle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 (edited) 23 hours ago, Outpost31 said: Ratings Update: In just under a week, You Have 24 Hours has reached half the posts of Survivor III. It has over a quarter of the number of posts in Big Brother 8, and it has over a 7th of the views. It is now in the running for a TASTY Best Game Award. GotY without the host updating the title with the page number of the active challenge gonna be a long shot Edited October 18, 2019 by Malfatron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 I’m just amazed. Tk3’s original argument was that I was right, but it’s not statistically insignificant. Now, he’s making up stories and anecdotes to make himself look like less of a mental midget. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 I’m just saying: Malf is apparently stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 Just now, SwAg said: I’m just saying: Malf is apparently stupid. no. if true random is used, the odds are spread evenly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Malfatron said: no. if true random is used, the odds are spread evenly Yeah tk3 made up what the argument was Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.