Chiefs_5627 Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 Rapoport said the Chiefs were working on an extension for months and were close.. until Davante got his cash then Reek wanted to top it and the Chiefs balked. Maybe common knowledge at this point but I assumed they just started negotiations when we heard it reported. But at least we know that we were trying to make this happen and I think Tyreek wanted to wait out the market to see what he could get. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mayanfootball Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 20 minutes ago, Chiefs_5627 said: and I think Tyreek wanted to wait out the market to see what he could get. No allegiance to TEAM anymore. Guess it's been that way for a bit. Only allegiance to the almighty dollar. How sad...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EMAW_KSU Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 13 minutes ago, mayanfootball said: No allegiance to TEAM anymore. Guess it's been that way for a bit. Only allegiance to the almighty dollar. How sad...... I don’t think this is always the case, but in a league where you can be cut tomorrow for not playing to standard…can you blame people for getting theirs? It’s hard for us to imagine, but easy for us to judge Ty for wanting out over 2m per year…but it’s different when that’s the life you lead I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EMAW_KSU Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 Interesting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mayanfootball Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 Either of Metcalf or Lockett would be quite welcome I sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefs_5627 Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 9 minutes ago, EMAW_KSU said: Interesting Either one would be awesome with Pat but DK is a year away from, probably, trying to top Davante as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefs_5627 Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 Khalen to the rescue? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 I don't see the point of adding Metcalf. We would have the exact same issue than with Tyreek so why spend heavy compensation for him? Makes no sense to me. Lockett could be a better fit in the sense that he should be a whole lot cheaper. Of course Lockett isn't tyreek but if the price is right we could the resources we got to other positions. With that being said I think the Tyreek trade shows that we're in a mini rebuild (or reload maybe) phase where we have a lot of picks coming and we need to add valuable contributors on rookie deals to rebuild a championship window next year or the year after. That's the way I see it at least. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EMAW_KSU Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 39 minutes ago, TedLavie said: I don't see the point of adding Metcalf. We would have the exact same issue than with Tyreek so why spend heavy compensation for him? Makes no sense to me. Lockett could be a better fit in the sense that he should be a whole lot cheaper. Of course Lockett isn't tyreek but if the price is right we could the resources we got to other positions. With that being said I think the Tyreek trade shows that we're in a mini rebuild (or reload maybe) phase where we have a lot of picks coming and we need to add valuable contributors on rookie deals to rebuild a championship window next year or the year after. That's the way I see it at least. You wouldn’t add Metcalf without knowing his price. Lockett is locked in for 4 more years, and even at the high end he’s suddenly become a bargain almost. Problem with Lockett is he’s 29 already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakuvious Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 44 minutes ago, TedLavie said: I don't see the point of adding Metcalf. We would have the exact same issue than with Tyreek so why spend heavy compensation for him? Makes no sense to me. Lockett could be a better fit in the sense that he should be a whole lot cheaper. Of course Lockett isn't tyreek but if the price is right we could the resources we got to other positions. With that being said I think the Tyreek trade shows that we're in a mini rebuild (or reload maybe) phase where we have a lot of picks coming and we need to add valuable contributors on rookie deals to rebuild a championship window next year or the year after. That's the way I see it at least. It's likely Metcalf would be at least a little bit cheaper, but he also would be 4 years younger. You might take a 24 year old Metcalf at $24M per year, over 28 year old Hill at $30M per year, as an example. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mayanfootball Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 Dang, Tyreek looked GOOD in our RED uni's....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mayanfootball Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 Reading about KC talking to Green Bay about Marquez Valdes-Scantling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onejayhawk Posted March 24, 2022 Author Share Posted March 24, 2022 I can't he;p but think that we got his prime years. Not everyone improves with age like Kelce. Just now, mayanfootball said: Reading about KC talking to Green Bay about Marquez Valdes-Scantling. It looks like we are after quality 3rd WR. J Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingseanjohn Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 Just draft two WR and I’ll be happy. We don’t need to trade for another vet on a one year deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mayanfootball Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 26 minutes ago, kingseanjohn said: Just draft two WR and I’ll be happy. We don’t need to trade for another vet on a one year deal. I'd be good with that. It's a deep WR draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.