Oregon Trail Mafia - Settlers and Malf Wins

[TheKillerNacho]

2 minutes ago, Whicker said:

You guys understand we still had to lynch someone, right? You guys understand that gopher was picked because the theory might be wrong, right? Or are we ignoring all context like usual 

We didn't need to lynch gopher to know the theory was wrong. We should've lynched Slappy or someone humoring it.

[Whicker]

Just now, TheKillerNacho said:

lol

Dude. 

I don’t know how you don’t get how something that was not properly refuted and used proper logic can be a bad theory. I can be wrong but my process can be correct. That’s literally all we have in a game of mafia to go off of. The very fact that people **** on people using their logic on unknown information is the reason why town never wins and people quit playing. What’s the point of doing anything proactive if anytime you’re wrong people just laugh? I’ve never laughed at someone using logic in a mafia game regardless of result 

[Malfatron]

Better to evict someone for reasons than for no reason at all.

The theory cut the possible members to eliminate down to 5

Now if the whole field is up for grabs, thats tough. Votes get spread around.

But when you can only choose 5, we get some nice voting lines

[Whicker]

Just now, TheKillerNacho said:

We didn't need to lynch gopher to know the theory was wrong. We should've lynched Slappy.

Slappy plays the game. I don’t know if you actually read anything I said about why I picked gopher but it is out there 

[Malfatron]

2 minutes ago, TheKillerNacho said:

We didn't need to lynch gopher to know the theory was wrong. We should've lynched Slappy or someone humoring it.

People could have but didnt

Lets dig to find out why.

In other words, lets play the game

[TheKillerNacho]

3 minutes ago, Whicker said:

Dude. 

I don’t know how you don’t get how something that was not properly refuted and used proper logic can be a bad theory. I can be wrong but my process can be correct. That’s literally all we have in a game of mafia to go off of. The very fact that people **** on people using their logic on unknown information is the reason why town never wins and people quit playing. What’s the point of doing anything proactive if anytime you’re wrong people just laugh? I’ve never laughed at someone using logic in a mafia game regardless of result 

A far simpler explanation existed.

[TheKillerNacho]

1 minute ago, Malfatron said:

People could have but didnt

Lets dig to find out why.

In other words, lets play the game

I already outted my scumreads with that in mind.

[Whicker]

Just now, TheKillerNacho said:

A far simpler explanation existed.

You keep saying this. This does NOT refute logic on its own 

[The Orca]

1 minute ago, Malfatron said:

Better to evict someone for reasons than for no reason at all.

The theory cut the possible members to eliminate down to 5

Now if the whole field is up for grabs, thats tough. Votes get spread around.

But when you can only choose 5, we get some nice voting lines

This is the only decent aspect of it, limiting who to look at....should have stopped the original push and focused on the individuals of the limited field, which actual reasons from there 

[TheKillerNacho]

2 minutes ago, Whicker said:

Slappy plays the game. I don’t know if you actually read anything I said about why I picked gopher but it is out there 

I actually don't suspect you.

[TheKillerNacho]

Just now, Whicker said:

You keep saying this. This does NOT refute logic on its own 

I don't need to completely refute it. It was a case of Occam's razor.

[Malfatron]

Just now, TheKillerNacho said:

I already outted my scumreads with that in mind.

There you go.

But leave my man whicker alone on this.

Its only because of the theory that you were able to get some major reads

We agree on slappy being mafia anyway

[TheKillerNacho]

4 minutes ago, Malfatron said:

Better to evict someone for reasons than for no reason at all.

The theory cut the possible members to eliminate down to 5

Now if the whole field is up for grabs, thats tough. Votes get spread around.

But when you can only choose 5, we get some nice voting lines

are you saying you never actually bought your own theory?

yes or no

[Malfatron]

1 minute ago, The Orca said:

This is the only decent aspect of it, limiting who to look at....should have stopped the original push and focused on the individuals of the limited field, which actual reasons from there 

Yes, but that wasnt my role to do so

I had to be the catalyst and then see who else would scumhunt or wouldnt

[Malfatron]

1 minute ago, TheKillerNacho said:

are you saying you never actually bought your own theory?

yes or no

Thats up to you to decide whether im the type of person who would do such a thing