theuntouchable Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 3 minutes ago, pwny said: So I take it that @theuntouchable is suggesting I test a throw on (one of) those three people? Yes, they were the ones that have not been hit with a stone yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFlaccoSeagulls Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 throw one stone at Ted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, James said: Yeah, but he's been inactive compared to his normal self so I don't know if he's the best person to be making those calls. I’ve been here when I could be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 1 minute ago, squire12 said: I am thinking there is some other mechanism on the redirects. Could be an x-shot that they used up. Could be that they decided not to use it to mess with us. Could be that dingo or pwny's votes get redirected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 Just now, theuntouchable said: Yes, they were the ones that have not been hit with a stone yet. Is there any reason that stones should be used to uncover whether something redirects? Or is it actually better to just put them on scum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 Just now, James said: Could be an x-shot that they used up. Could be that they decided not to use it to mess with us. Could be that dingo or pwny's votes get redirected. All true. Just looking at the odds of the first 9 to throw were unaffected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Orca Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 Just now, James said: Could be an x-shot that they used up. Could be that they decided not to use it to mess with us. Could be that dingo or pwny's votes get redirected. Could it be a day move that hasn't been put in yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 1 minute ago, theuntouchable said: Yes, they were the ones that have not been hit with a stone yet. Just now, theuntouchable said: I’ve been here when I could be. From what we saw the last two days I'm pretty confident its about the voter, not the target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 Just now, pwny said: Is there any reason that stones should be used to uncover whether something redirects? Or is it actually better to just put them on scum? The idea is just to test one to make sure your votes later will count. Last night I put in my votes late and they all got redirected. I think you should try to vote scum even with the test one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 21 hours ago, Dome said: 21 hours ago, James said: Throw a stone at sanchez Throw a stone at sanchez Throw a stone at sanchez Throw a stone at sanchez HEADS UP! You nail Flacco twice! Pickle Rick once! and woz once! @pwny See the stone thrown by James on Day 3. They were redirected from his primary target to others. We are trying to figure out if there is some reasoning on this so multiple throws at someone are not redirected to random players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, The Orca said: Could it be a day move that hasn't been put in yet? Maybe. I think I was targeted yesterday because the day before I mentioned my extra stone. Feels like they would've used it on me the day I mentioned it if it was a day move, but maybe they already sent it in that day. Lots of possibilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 4 minutes ago, pwny said: Is there any reason that stones should be used to uncover whether something redirects? Or is it actually better to just put them on scum? They beat me to it, I think it’s still possible that it’s about the person voted for but I could have missed something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 So why did Ted throw three stones at a claimed other? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 4 minutes ago, James said: From what we saw the last two days I'm pretty confident its about the voter, not the target. It could be many things. May be related to the x number of stones that have been thrown that day. May have to be related to singular throws vs ones made in clusters. Day 1 there were a lot more singular throws Day 2 there were more triple throws Day 3 again more triple throws Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 Just now, theuntouchable said: They beat me to it, I think it’s still possible that it’s about the person voted for but I could have missed something Other people had voted for sanchez yesterday and their votes worked, while mine on him were redirected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.