theuntouchable Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Yay! I win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Also, the revisionist history in this one is hilarious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 23 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: Also, the revisionist history in this one is hilarious its pretty common, tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Wait there were SIX total fruit vendors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tk3 said: Wait there were SIX total fruit vendors? i counted 7 naz was basically a nerfed fruit vendor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 So was this Royal thing an actual thing? I feel like I'm still confused over some of what made me a target in the first place. I get Malf's reasoning, although I still think it was a null tell - I would have done what I did regardless of alignment and there were not other options at the time The logic of "TK as a civ wouldn't claim" while constantly saying "we shouldn't lynch someone who isn't online because they are not online to claim" is abhorrent to me, but I didn't want to overreact to it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 20 minutes ago, Tk3 said: i get Malf's reasoning, although I still think it was a null tell - I would have done what I did regardless of alignment and there were not other options at the time The logic of "TK as a civ wouldn't claim" while constantly saying "we shouldn't lynch someone who isn't online because they are not online to claim" is abhorrent to me, but I didn't want to overreact to it i figured that you wouldnt claim when you had a good chance to save yourself. At the time, I didnt understand that you were misinterpreting the tiebreaker rules, so i saw the claim as an attempt to lolclear yourself with fruit. it was a good read even though my assumptions might have been incorrect (did you really misunderstand the tiebreaker rules?) also, when people were trying to lynch a random person instead of mission at the last minute, i was against it because those people would not be around to claim. i see that as a different scenario than your case because it would have been easy for you to save yourself by voting another leading vote gettter. also, the main difference is that i was worried about lynching a power role (strong role) who might not be able to claim. you were a weak vanilla role. if i was in your position (i was a weak role too) i wouldnt have claimed at that time, so the claim felt off to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 33 minutes ago, Tk3 said: its pretty common, tbh Yea but it’s normally not this bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 26 minutes ago, Tk3 said: So was this Royal thing an actual thing? I feel like I'm still confused over some of what made me a target in the first place. as for this part, i didnt really get where swag was going with this mechanic thing. so that probably didnt play into it at all. i was mostly suspicious of you at the end of d1, but after swag was confused by the tiebreaker thing too at start of d2, i thought you might actually be civ, and i cooled on you quite a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 12 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: Yea but it’s normally not this bad i think it might be the swag factor. swags reads were really on point, so a couple people felt that had to alter reality in order to compete with swag. thats what i am going with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 also, i liked the way you played this game too, touch. we both noticed the same thing with wozs post, but his fake gun reference had nothing to do with his role so it threw me off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, Malfatron said: also, i liked the way you played this game too, touch. we both noticed the same thing with wozs post, but his fake gun reference had nothing to do with his role so it threw me off. I know lol it’s goid to know we saw the same thing. Erroneous or not lmao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 12 minutes ago, Malfatron said: i think it might be the swag factor. swags reads were really on point, so a couple people felt that had to alter reality in order to compete with swag. thats what i am going with. You have no idea how hard it was to have to try to defend the loudest most abrasive voice against you in an effort to garner pickle/orca to your side maybe I’m wrong, but I thought my only move was to peg swag as misguided civ. If I turned on him I assumed everyone who was on the fence would immediately see through me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 9 minutes ago, Tk3 said: You have no idea how hard it was to have to try to defend the loudest most abrasive voice against you in an effort to garner pickle/orca to your side maybe I’m wrong, but I thought my only move was to peg swag as misguided civ. If I turned on him I assumed everyone who was on the fence would immediately see through me you got close. if i was you and you got a ml tonight, i would have exploded them it was a tough situation because you planted the chip in people who could vote with you but if james was mislynched, and you exploded everyone, it would be 2-1 tk3, naz, touch i think you may have had a chance here, even if touch vited against you. it would have depended on naz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 16 minutes ago, Malfatron said: you got close. if i was you and you got a ml tonight, i would have exploded them it was a tough situation because you planted the chip in people who could vote with you but if james was mislynched, and you exploded everyone, it would be 2-1 tk3, naz, touch i think you may have had a chance here, even if touch vited against you. it would have depended on naz It would have been 3-1 Dome was incorrect, Orca was never tagged Which means I still would have needed 2 more MLs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.