BayRaider Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 4 minutes ago, NCOUGHMAN said: So if no one offers a 1st....will Pitt keep him? Lolol pitt has no leverage imo Exactly. However my fear here is if the Niners offer #36 and we offer #35. If I’m Steelers I take 36 and ship him to the NFC. So basically if the Niners offer 36, we’d have to offer 27. I would pass at that point and let the Niners have him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NightTrainLane Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 5 minutes ago, NCOUGHMAN said: So if no one offers a 1st....will Pitt keep him? Lolol pitt has no leverage imo Exactly. This just outs their position. The Raiders should only be offering 35th now, if that. Nothing is better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justwinbaby81 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Id rather try to get OBJ for 27. Hell Id rather try to get OBJ for 24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayRaider Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 2 minutes ago, justwinbaby81 said: Id rather try to get OBJ for 27. Hell Id rather try to get OBJ for 24 Giants aren’t letting OBJ go unless it’s a Top 15 pick, probably Top 10. They’d probably do a swap of 6 and 4 plus 24. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justwinbaby81 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 1 minute ago, BayRaider said: Giants aren’t letting OBJ go unless it’s a Top 15 pick, probably Top 10. They’d probably do a swap of 6 and 4 plus 24. I guess we will see. Jay Glazer and others have stood firm that they expect he gets traded this offseason. We will see what they get when Cooper goes for a 1st, Brown for (inevitably) 27th overall, and Cooks for late 1st twice. The precedent is pretty well set. I bet 24 would do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayRaider Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Do the Steelers need a G? I'd rather do Osemele and 35 than 27. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCOUGHMAN Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 5 minutes ago, BayRaider said: Do the Steelers need a G? I'd rather do Osemele and 35 than 27. Or what if we swap #4 for #20 + ab? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayRaider Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Just now, NCOUGHMAN said: Or what if we swap #4 for #20 + ab? I don't think the Steelers would go for that. I'd probably do it. I'm so god damn high on Devin Bush, who the Steelers probably take at 20, that I might just do that trade. We'd still get Devin Bush at 20, and at 24/27 we could go back to back edge rushers such as Polite and Ferguson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justwinbaby81 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 1 minute ago, NCOUGHMAN said: Or what if we swap #4 for #20 + ab? Nah. Thats more value than #27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agarcia34 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Wait what? Give up a top 5 pick for 20 and AB? That would actually be the last straw for me. That actually made me angry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayRaider Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 1 minute ago, justwinbaby81 said: Nah. Thats more value than #27 We still keep all four of our draft picks though which IMO is way more valuable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agarcia34 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 The Raiders would be the dumbest team in the history all sports if they did that trade. That’s how terrible that trade would be. You don’t give up a top 5 pick for a mid to late round pick and a player. A top 5 pick hold so much value and you’re giving it up for pick 20 and a WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justwinbaby81 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 1 minute ago, BayRaider said: We still keep all four of our draft picks though which IMO is way more valuable. Theyre not even in the same ball park for value Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayRaider Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 I’ll have to kindly disagree with you guys. I’d easily swap 4 and 20 than give up 27 straight up. You’re basically giving up a starter. 35 is another story. I’d probably do that one straight up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agarcia34 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Pick 4 1800 Pick 20 850 thats the value to those picks. And let’s not even get into the huge difference in players u can get a 4 compared to 20. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.