ny92mike Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 Where did I mention olb's covering TE's? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted September 25, 2019 Author Share Posted September 25, 2019 1 minute ago, ny92mike said: Where did I mention olb's covering TE's? When you ran a 5 man front with a 4 man rush scheme and a Cover-2 shell but your SS also in man coverage. Can’t have it all ways. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 3 minutes ago, Whicker said: When you ran a 5 man front with a 4 man rush scheme and a Cover-2 shell but your SS also in man coverage. Can’t have it all ways. So if I've got 5 guys in the secondary I've got to put my olb's in coverage too, I don't get it. Maybe that's on me, cover 2 man at least the way I see it meant two guys were were playing zone essentially leaving 3 of the secondary guys playing man. And when did it because something not allowed to point out players on the opponents team? My point was very valid about Ingram being used incorrectly in bdl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted September 25, 2019 Author Share Posted September 25, 2019 I suppose Singapore could clarify and I’d be willing to change my vote if they can properly reconcile with me how this would work. Cover-2 man. Kareem Jackson at FS covering one deep zone. McCourty on Boyd. Roby on Kupp. Jones/??? on 3rd WR/2nd TE. Deion on Ingram. This leaves Josh Johnson, Preston Smith, Danielle Hunter, Aaron Donald, Damon Harrison, and Zach Allen to cover Kittle, play 1 more deep zone, and rush. Who is doing what here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted September 25, 2019 Author Share Posted September 25, 2019 Just now, ny92mike said: So if I've got 5 guys in the secondary I've got to put my olb's in coverage too, I don't get it. Maybe that's on me, cover 2 man at least the way I see it meant two guys were were playing zone essentially leaving 3 of the secondary guys playing man. And when did it because something not allowed to point out players on the opponents team? My point was very valid about Ingram being used incorrectly in bdl. Because a Cover-2 requires two deep zones. That’s what it is. You need 6 guys to play Cover-2 against 4 receivers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted September 25, 2019 Author Share Posted September 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, ny92mike said: So if I've got 5 guys in the secondary I've got to put my olb's in coverage too, I don't get it. Maybe that's on me, cover 2 man at least the way I see it meant two guys were were playing zone essentially leaving 3 of the secondary guys playing man. And when did it because something not allowed to point out players on the opponents team? My point was very valid about Ingram being used incorrectly in bdl. You have to cover 4 guys. Boys, Kupp, Fant/Agholor, Kittle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 Just now, Whicker said: Because a Cover-2 requires two deep zones. That’s what it is. You need 6 guys to play Cover-2 against 4 receivers. Was thinking I shifted to a 326 when he stacked it up at receiver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted September 25, 2019 Author Share Posted September 25, 2019 And you can spend all the time you want pointing out opponent player flaws. It’s just not what I prefer and I only write my own voting paradigm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 This isn't worth my time really, you don't agree with the scheme or any of it really offense or defense. Read it how you'd like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted September 25, 2019 Author Share Posted September 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, ny92mike said: Was thinking I shifted to a 326 when he stacked it up at receiver. Okay so Tracy Walker plays the deep zone. Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted September 25, 2019 Author Share Posted September 25, 2019 1 minute ago, ny92mike said: This isn't worth my time really, you don't agree with the scheme or any of it really offense or defense. Read it how you'd like. And this is why I don’t like commenting on games. Should have kept my mouth shut sorry for trying to understand how your SS is both covering Kittle and playing a deep zone as it seems to be written Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted September 25, 2019 Author Share Posted September 25, 2019 (edited) Never mind not worth it Edited September 25, 2019 by Whicker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Whicker said: And this is why I don’t like commenting on games. Should have kept my mouth shut sorry for trying to understand how your SS is both covering Kittle and playing a deep zone as it seems to be written That's the thing about doing these write ups. You can't cover everything when the opponents game plan is making changes after the snap, whether his back stays in or goes out, same with TE's depending on how many blitzers I'm bringing. Impossible to defend against that type of stuff and you know that. Doesn't matter what defensive scheme you bring. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 Rest assured this will be my last. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 6 minutes ago, ny92mike said: That's the thing about doing these write ups. You can't cover everything when the opponents game plan is making changes after the snap, whether his back stays in or goes out, same with TE's depending on how many blitzers I'm bringing. Impossible to defend against that type of stuff and you know that. Doesn't matter what defensive scheme you bring. You heard it here folks. Impossible to defend against my Offense. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.