SwAg Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 So, you read those posts, but didn't read MWil's posts initially, or even secondarily. You skimmed them. And instead of reading them for a slip, you posted all of them and sought clarification. Which had an effect of stifling that inquiry. Matts, it's like your still stuck in the theme of the last game. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Dome said: Now you're just taunting me, you ****. lol, we won that game. How is it taunting? 1 minute ago, SwAg said: That doesn't make sense. You just have to combine my laziness with a IDGAF attidtude and maybe it will paint a clearer picture. I probably shouldnt even be playing tbh. I have about 60 hours of CE due by the end of the month. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 Just now, Dome said: I'm afraid he could be dumb town, and somehow I'll look foolish for lynching him. The literal explanation so far is "I'm not scum hunting" and "I would be a moron to do what I did." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 Gotcha. We should remove you now to allow you to focus on work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dome Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 When I have enough time to read through a specific player's posts two different times looking for a small detail that he might have given up, I never actually read them. This all checks out. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 Witch hunt! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 1 minute ago, SwAg said: Gotcha. We should remove you now to allow you to focus on work. Works for me. 1 minute ago, Dome said: When I have enough time to read through a specific player's posts two different times looking for a small detail that he might have given up, I never actually read them. This all checks out. Thats not what I said. I skimmed them once on my read through. I went back and pulled them all in chronological order, skimmed through them again to see if anything was said about this game; there wasnt really - so I asked Malf to tell me what I am looking for based on last game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 Yeah, Dome, matts' argument is that he never read them. So, naturally, he couldn't find the slip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 I mean, I guess you could think that's better? Having two opportunities to read, electing not to read both times, and then seeking help when you cannot find the answer by not reading. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 Just now, SwAg said: Yeah, Dome, matts' argument is that he never read them. So, naturally, he couldn't find the slip. False. Maybe you have a different definition, but skimming through you can usually gather the general message Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dome Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 3 minutes ago, Matts4313 said: False. Maybe you have a different definition, but skimming through you can usually gather the general message you said you "skimmed a few lines" 21 minutes ago, Matts4313 said: It is in the laymans version. I saw Malfs post, went into Mwils post history, saw that there were 4 post. Skimmed a few lines, realized they were all talking about last game; decided to quote and let Malf explain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Matts4313 said: fake activity imo fair point. But its still not a fight. Shut up trash bag Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, Dome said: you said you "skimmed a few lines" Yes, I did say the *second time* I skimmed a few lines. Good job. Minus some points from yourself for not being able to follow the conversation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 23 minutes ago, Matts4313 said: correct. I wasnt going to comb through them when it was based on conversations I wasnt a part of. Though to be fair, it was the second time I skimmed through them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted November 14, 2019 Share Posted November 14, 2019 You're the one who used "skim" instead of "read," which is different. I'm using your terminology. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.