Jump to content

The Original Pokemon Mafia - We're all losers.


Hockey5djh

Recommended Posts

Just now, SwAg said:

Matts is desperate to control this narrative, and is misconstruing it awfully.

Matts bumped all of MWil's posts and asked Malfatron to explain the slip because all of his posts are about last game.  This is a defense of MWil, as it mitigates the risk to MWil, essentially asks for the case against him, while matts keeps maintaining he skimmed to give him deniability for having missed any prospective slip, while giving an excuse to have knowledge of the game.

Ok I will make sure to keep this write up in the forefront of everyones mind. 

Do we include the rest or is that all a circus? Because you have also stated that:

1. 4 times I have read the front page and used it as a "gotcha" moment

2. 5 times I have used the "you are so wrong" argument as scum.

3. Lobbied to host in secret to have you mod-killed

4. Used the word skim, but what I really meant was I didnt read at all or possibly I just read "stupidly" (im not sure where you ended up on that one). 

 

I want to make sure I fully encapsulate your case against me. Ya know, be fair and all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Matts4313 said:

Ahh. I remember this. This is just like when you claimed to find Domes hidden message. This is a tool often used by Swag. Here is the play by play.

Swag will say something outlandish or false. He will then ask other people to agree with him or to do the work for him. 

If: Someone does agree or finds something, he feels vindicated and pounds his chest.

If: No one does agree or finds his "proof" he will tout the holier than thou "I am big man, me no need to comply to your request". 

 

I think weve wasted enough time on your lies and ridiculous assertions. 

 

17 minutes ago, SwAg said:

This is literally nothing like Dome’s message in FF.  I literally never found it.  I even admitted that I never found it, twice.  I only accepted your version because no one else claimed it, and presented it twice. 

I am literally saying the names of the people who were deeply involved in the thread developments at the time you did the various actions.  I tagged Counselor and then you remembered it.  It’s literally getting players to talk and substantiate what I say when they have reason to be able to do so, yet you’re acting as if I made it up and it is some false implanted memory.

You’re not going to trick me into doing what you want.

 

12 minutes ago, Matts4313 said:

lol. Yes. I remembered because you tagged counselor. Not because you said "the game where you posted your full PM and others followed". Smart. 

 

Anywho. You pointed out PR liking my post. That stood out to me as well. He is clearly following along, but not contributing. 

Seriously.  Look at these quotes.  Matts has perpetually, on several occasions in this thread, ignored most of the content of a post to simply address some minor or tertiary aspect of it or otherwise misconstrue it, and then cause confusion and "have the last word" on all of it, regardless of how ******* stupid his statements are.

The principal case is simple, and I implore you all to not lose sight of it while matts tries to cause chaos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Matts4313 said:

Ok I will make sure to keep this write up in the forefront of everyones mind. 

Do we include the rest or is that all a circus? Because you have also stated that:

1. 4 times I have read the front page and used it as a "gotcha" moment

2. 5 times I have used the "you are so wrong" argument as scum.

3. Lobbied to host in secret to have you mod-killed

4. Used the word skim, but what I really meant was I didnt read at all or possibly I just read "stupidly" (im not sure where you ended up on that one). 

 

I want to make sure I fully encapsulate your case against me. Ya know, be fair and all. 

See, you're again, summarizing a bunch of secondary statements that I made off-hand, while completely avoiding the sum and substance of the main argument.

1.  No one here is even contesting that.  You're barely contesting it.  And I'm not holding it out as some compelling argument.  You made some argument about how you don't read the OP unless you have a reason to do so, yet you clearly take initiative and read the OP based on past games.  I already described two of those games in detail, but because I did not go find all of the threads, and the points in those threads that prove it, you're throwing your hands in the air and pretending it does not count.  It is not persuasive.  It is bull****, and it is merely you attempting to detract from a point that you already know is substantially true.

2.  Again, I'm not holding it out as a compelling argument for other people, but everyone has internalized reads that are effective, yet they do not state what they are because then you get responses of skepticism.  I provided you with a sample of your most recent Town games, and showed you did not do it there.  I said you did it in two Town games, and offered those.  I said you did it five times, and you did.  I offered to give you a majority of the scum games, as long as you agreed to help me find the others, and you said "no, you have the burden of proof."  Lol, I don't need this point to prove you're guilty.  You want me to do it to (1) waste time; (2) give you something else to yell about that is a distraction; (3) frustrate me by after I do the work, you create some half-baked rationale to explain it like you've done both times I have semi-indulged you so far; or (4) something equally malicious.

3.  You're definitely the type to lobby for a modkill.  No one is going to believe that you're not.

4.  You've fixated on "skim" and derailed almost all conversation from the main argument with pages about your inability to read at a middle school level.  

 

Again, the main point is: MWil is scum, and he entered the thread with a bit of heat.  Malfatron made up that he slipped, and Matts came in to defend him and end Malfatron's inquiry immediately.  Matts faceplanted the explanation, which segued to Point 4 above, and maintains it isn't a defense, itjust has the happy consequence of functioning as one.  They are inextricably connected for at least this phase, and likely our best lead for the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Matts4313 said:

most of the content isnt worth addressing tbh

No, you couldn't address it any way other than disingenuously, but you had to respond in some way to give the appearance of a refutation, so you chose some innocuous portion.  Good work.  You're a ******* easy clap as scum, scrub.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Matts4313 said:

ugh. You are no fun. Though he does seriously call me scum every game. Does the same with you and Malf. 

He likes yall though.

"SwAg always does this.  He's such a rascal.  And he's always wrong.  Why can't you sympathize with me.  He does this to you too."

You're trying to portray this as some baseless fixation.  People can just read the thread and see that I have described your actions accurately and reasonably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...