Jump to content

2020 NFL Draft: Discussion, Reports, Rumors, and Studies


jetskid007

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, bspice said:

Take it for what it’s worth but I just read that the Dolphins are looking to trade up to the #3 spot to grab the best OT. They want to leapfrog the Giants to do that 

Source: Total Pro Sports

Pure smoke screen to try and stop a team from trading ahead of them for a QB. Or at least reduce the cost of trading up since less teams would be trying to jump them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Dr.O said:

Because it be a dumb move for a team with as many holes as we have to do. Stay at 11 take an OT if one of the 4 falls if not take Jeudy, Lamb, or Ruggs and use the rest of the draft capital to take shots at other positions we need

There are people in our fanbase who suggest taking any of the perceived "top" WRs would be a smarter team building philosophy than taking any of the perceived "top" OTs regardless who it is. That's what I'm pointing out here, not that we should trade up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting scenario: 

1.Cin: Burrow

2.WAS: Young

3.MIA: Wirfs

4.MYG: Thomas

5. DET: Okudah

6.LAC: Tua

7.CAR: Brown

8.AZ: Wills

9.JAX: Kinlaw

10. CLE:Becton

11. *ATL: Henderson (we get their 3rd and 4th)

12.LVR: CeeDee

13.SF: Jeudy

14.TB: Josh Jones

15.DEN: Ruggs

16.NYJ: ?

 

What do we do in this scenario?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dr.O said:

Interesting scenario: 

1.Cin: Burrow

2.WAS: Young

3.MIA: Wirfs

4.MYG: Thomas

5. DET: Okudah

6.LAC: Tua

7.CAR: Brown

8.AZ: Wills

9.JAX: Kinlaw

10. CLE:Becton

11. *ATL: Henderson (we get their 3rd and 4th)

12.LVR: CeeDee

13.SF: Jeudy

14.TB: Josh Jones

15.DEN: Ruggs

16.NYJ: ?

 

What do we do in this scenario?

Log off this forum 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dr.O said:

Interesting scenario: 

1.Cin: Burrow

2.WAS: Young

3.MIA: Wirfs

4.MYG: Thomas

5. DET: Okudah

6.LAC: Tua

7.CAR: Brown

8.AZ: Wills

9.JAX: Kinlaw

10. CLE:Becton

11. *ATL: Henderson (we get their 3rd and 4th)

12.LVR: CeeDee

13.SF: Jeudy

14.TB: Josh Jones

15.DEN: Ruggs

16.NYJ: ?

 

What do we do in this scenario?

This would be awful. I say go Justin Jefferson

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JetsandI said:

Hard to pin on certain prospects but why the hell not.

 

#1-  Agreed.

#2- L'Jarius Sneed.  Picked him over his teammate Amik Robertson because of size and ability to play all spots in DB.  KJ Hamler if no Ruggs.

#3- Austin Jackson

#4- I like Mason Kinsey but Alex Taylor makes sense here.

Alex Taylor fits that basketball athlete we’re looking for at OT. He’d be a good pick in day 3 as a developmental guy. Good athlete 6’8” with 36 inch arms and 11” hands. He can grab you with one finger with those hands. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dr.O said:

Interesting scenario: 

1.Cin: Burrow

2.WAS: Young

3.MIA: Wirfs

4.MYG: Thomas

5. DET: Okudah

6.LAC: Tua

7.CAR: Brown

8.AZ: Wills

9.JAX: Kinlaw

10. CLE:Becton

11. *ATL: Henderson (we get their 3rd and 4th)

12.LVR: CeeDee

13.SF: Jeudy

14.TB: Josh Jones

15.DEN: Ruggs

16.NYJ: ?

 

What do we do in this scenario?

Stay and draft Lamb lol

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dr.O said:

Interesting scenario: 

1.Cin: Burrow

2.WAS: Young

3.MIA: Wirfs

4.MYG: Thomas

5. DET: Okudah

6.LAC: Tua

7.CAR: Brown

8.AZ: Wills

9.JAX: Kinlaw

10. CLE:Becton

11. *ATL: Henderson (we get their 3rd and 4th)

12.LVR: CeeDee

13.SF: Jeudy

14.TB: Josh Jones

15.DEN: Ruggs

16.NYJ: ?

 

What do we do in this scenario?

I have a high level of confidence that it would likely be Austin Jackson with an outside chance of it being K'Lavon Chaisson or AJ Terrell

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dr.O said:

Lmao I’m just saying I can see JD not valuing the WR spot because of how deep the class is and after the Big 4 go could move out.

I think he takes the best OT left on his board. Maybe look to trade back again 

I wasn’t telling you to log off, I meant if that scenario played out, that’s what I’d do. Unless you just spoke this into existence, then log off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...