Jump to content

Cardiac Cats at Cowboys, a winning GDT


Matts4313

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Texas_OutLaw7 said:

We absolutely disagree. I follow the math and probability. 

You don’t. That’s okay. But this all started because you said a decision was stupid when it wasn’t. Your feelings got in the way of the math.  

This time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Matts4313 said:

If they use analytics properly this should never happen. Ever. 

They should always go with the choice that has the greatest probability of winning. Whether they win or lose is an entirely different matter.

Ahhh, this I have NOT seen. "Properly" being the subjective term.

What defines "properly"?

Is it a chart with percentages?

To dig deeper into my insecurity with this approach and, especially this team, properly is a fairly loose term.

It allows for advocates of analytics to claim, in the event of failure, that it wasn't used "properly".

Ie: an out.

Can this team govern themselves enough to know when "properly" is enforced?

Example: 1992 NFC championship game. Dallas is in SF red zone and has a chance to either kick a FG, going up 2 scores, or going for a TD or 1st down on 4th down

They choose to go for it and don't get it.

If, and hindsight is 20/20, they lost that game because SF capitalized on our over-aggressiveness, who here would have agreed it was the right call, that is, was it used "properly?"

Believe me, I get what you are all saying, but the simple fact is I believe this team has a legit shot to compete for a title. I just don't want them to blow it do to a computer algorithm or something. I still believe that the human mind, knowing your team, camaraderie and just flat out will to win is what gets it done.

And when I saw them use analytics last week and NOT convert I was like, WTF!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Rtnldave said:

Is it a chart with percentages?

Pretty much. These things have been posted. Youve seen them. 

24 minutes ago, Rtnldave said:

It allows for advocates of analytics to claim, in the event of failure, that it wasn't used "properly"

No, it absolutely does not. Because the decision and the results are two separate entities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Rtnldave said:

I get what you are all saying

I really dont think you do. Because even in your last example - you got it wrong. If the analytics say go for, we do, and we lose... Then you ask why? Almost always it will be the players execution. Whether we executed poorly or the other team executed amazingly. 

Sometimes you happened to just call the absolute right/wrong play, which lessens the execution factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matts4313 said:

.............Exactly why you arent on the same page with me and others. 

Because after the penalty in the 1 point conversion attempt, which lead to the 2 point attempt, I was like, wtf, just take the easy point! 

But they went for it, missed it and Car took the lead at halftime. Had we lost that game due to following analytics in that scenario you are seriously going to sit there and tell me you and everyone else on here would be like, "it was the right thing to do?"

I will believe that when, and if, I see it.

 

Edited by Rtnldave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Rtnldave said:

, I was like, wtf, just take the easy point! 

Yes. Exactly. 

48 minutes ago, Rtnldave said:

But they went for it, missed it and Car took the lead at halftime.

This doesnt matter. I dont know how many times, and how many ways, people can repeat it. Its not the outcome, its the decision making process that matters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Matts4313 said:

Yes. Exactly. 

This doesnt matter. I dont know how many times, and how many ways, people can repeat it. Its not the outcome, its the decision making process that matters. 

Thank you for explaining that Matts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Matts4313 said:

Yes. Exactly. 

This doesnt matter. I dont know how many times, and how many ways, people can repeat it. Its not the outcome, its the decision making process that matters. 

I just disagree with the decision in these cases. I just think unless you have significant issues with your kicking game going for 2 does not help you as much as hurt you early in the game.  Also with the argument about analytics, I am fine with analytics but I feel you must not forget the emotional component.  Some time the numbers say go for it, but the number's never account for how much spark a team can get from either making the 1st down, or try or stopping the 1st down or try.  A players emotional state can play a huge factor in football.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...