Rockice_8 Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 Is there one example out there of a team trading a 1st for a 1-year rental? I can't think of any so essentially GB is looking to make history here? Doubtful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby816 Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 3 minutes ago, Rockice_8 said: Is there one example out there of a team trading a 1st for a 1-year rental? I can't think of any so essentially GB is looking to make history here? Doubtful. Never mind that guy being 39 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WheatieMan Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 44 minutes ago, Rockice_8 said: Is there one example out there of a team trading a 1st for a 1-year rental? I can't think of any so essentially GB is looking to make history here? Doubtful. Generational talent be generational talent. GB needs to be compensated for eating 9 million in dead money. That's worth a sizeable chunk of a Stafford type of deal, assuming GB has to eat that and then some of AR's base salary on top of that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangGreen420 Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 It’s gonna be a 2, conditional pick, Corey Davis 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockice_8 Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 38 minutes ago, WheatieMan said: Generational talent be generational talent. GB needs to be compensated for eating 9 million in dead money. That's worth a sizeable chunk of a Stafford type of deal, assuming GB has to eat that and then some of AR's base salary on top of that. And what do the Jets get for likely eating the dead money when he retires in a year or two? Jets aren't walking away in two years without cap ramifications because your GM gave him a dumb extension. We are taking your headache that is compensation enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby816 Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 35 minutes ago, GangGreen420 said: It’s gonna be a 2, conditional pick, Corey Davis Which is fair if you ask me. I wonder how the money works with AR and Davis though. I doubt it's them just taking on Davis' deal as is and us taking on ARs as is. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangGreen420 Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 5 minutes ago, Bobby816 said: Which is fair if you ask me. I wonder how the money works with AR and Davis though. I doubt it's them just taking on Davis' deal as is and us taking on ARs as is. I think that’s probably what they are hung up on, who’s taking on what 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby816 Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 5 minutes ago, GangGreen420 said: I think that’s probably what they are hung up on, who’s taking on what Davis' contract should be easy since he pretty much needs a new deal. So GB should just giver him a deal with him getting like 5mill with some incentives bc of his injury past. With AR that's a whole other deal. I'm sure that's what the hold up mainly is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDotNova Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 51 minutes ago, GangGreen420 said: It’s gonna be a 2, conditional pick, Corey Davis This has been my guess all along as well. The fact Corey Davis has not been traded or cut, suggest he is part of the deal. We could probably get a future day 3 pick for him. I think that's roughly the trade though. I'd say pick 43, a conditional pick in 2024, and Corey Davis for Rodgers and a conditional pick in 2025. The 2025 pick to the Jets is conditioned on Rodgers playing in 2024. And the conditional pick to the Packers is conditioned on Rodgers playing time in 2023 and the Jets making the playoffs. Only variable to me is how high the conditional picks will be. I'm thinking a 3rd that can be 2nd for GB. But I could also see a 3rd that can go as high as a 1st if we make a deep playoff run. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangGreen420 Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 This idea that Packers fans think other teams are interested in him 😂 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDotNova Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 (edited) 25 minutes ago, GangGreen420 said: This idea that Packers fans think other teams are interested in him 😂 It’s pretty funny to read some of those comments. They won’t be happy with a 2nd, conditional pick and Corey Davis. But that really is a fair deal. I think their beat reporters were too optimistic with the two 1st. And then all this talk about leverage. Skewed their expectations. 13 is somewhat crazy. But I saw Garrett Wilson’s name thrown out there which is even crazier. Edited March 21, 2023 by SDotNova Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby816 Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 37 minutes ago, SDotNova said: It’s pretty funny to read some of those comments. They won’t be happy with a 2nd, conditional pick and Corey Davis. But that really is a fair deal. I think their beat reporters were too optimistic with the two 1st. And then all this talk about leverage. Skewed their expectations. 13 is somewhat crazy. But I saw Garrett Wilson’s name thrown out there which is even crazier. It’s a good meet in the middle trade. We were never giving up just a mid rounder for him. And they were never getting 2 1sts. A vet WR when they have a young group. A 2nd that’s in the top half of the 2nd and a conditional pick that’s likely between a 2nd-4th is fair Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangGreen420 Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 40 minutes ago, SDotNova said: It’s pretty funny to read some of those comments. They won’t be happy with a 2nd, conditional pick and Corey Davis. But that really is a fair deal. I think their beat reporters were too optimistic with the two 1st. And then all this talk about leverage. Skewed their expectations. 13 is somewhat crazy. But I saw Garrett Wilson’s name thrown out there which is even crazier. They are all about that Andrew Brandt masterclass in leverage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangGreen420 Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 4 hours ago, Rockice_8 said: Is there one example out there of a team trading a 1st for a 1-year rental? I can't think of any so essentially GB is looking to make history here? Doubtful. They think they should get the same comp as the Stafford trade. He was “broken down” They are also comparing this trade to when they traded Davante Adams lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 21, 2023 Share Posted March 21, 2023 4 hours ago, Rockice_8 said: Is there one example out there of a team trading a 1st for a 1-year rental? I can't think of any so essentially GB is looking to make history here? Doubtful. Bradley Chubb. He was traded at the deadline as an expiring contract. Granted, he agreed to an extension 2 days later, but he was traded as an expiring contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.