Jump to content

2.45 - Trade Down With Detroit


CWood21

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, mtsportsfan1 said:

Question for the draft guys ? Was this a good deal for us points wise ? Did we make Detroit over pay like Minny did with us ? 

Using the value chart moving from 48 to 45 should cost 30 points and the Lions gave up 26.6 points. 

Moving from 50 to 48 should cost 20 points and the Buccaneers gave up 18.2 points. 

The Packers gave up 50 points in value and got back in return 36.8 points in value, but there is more to this big picture wise than just the point values. From the Packers side, if they were going to take Reed at pick number 45 yet felt they could take the lesser trade offers and still get the same player then they gained an extra 5th and 6th to use later for free. 

Now if they use one of those two picks to move up today to get a player they covet that they otherwise would have not gotten, well then, the shortcomings on the point values are more than made up for. Or they draft players and one of the lottery style picks end up the next Aaron Jones or even John Runyan then it was well worth it also. 

It's all about the big picture.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, R T said:

Using the value chart moving from 48 to 45 should cost 30 points and the Lions gave up 26.6 points. 

Moving from 50 to 48 should cost 20 points and the Buccaneers gave up 18.2 points. 

The Packers gave up 50 points in value and got back in return 36.8 points in value, but there is more to this big picture wise than just the point values. From the Packers side, if they were going to take Reed at pick number 45 yet felt they could take the lesser trade offers and still get the same player then they gained an extra 5th and 6th to use later for free. 

Now if they use one of those two picks to move up today to get a player they covet that they otherwise would have not gotten, well then, the shortcomings on the point values are more than made up for. Or they draft players and one of the lottery style picks end up the next Aaron Jones or even John Runyan then it was well worth it also. 

It's all about the big picture.

using "a" TVC, not "the"

likely not a very good one looking at your numbers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PackFan13 said:

They asked if the trades down still still got their guy and they just said they felt good with multiple guys on their board. Why not just lie and say he was your guy all along haha 

They probably don't want to say they got the same guy they would have taken at 45 just not to make any drama with the players taken in between.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, craig said:

Using the Rich Hill chart, both trades were both spot-on in point values.  I don't keep up with the most up-to-date charts.  Rich Hill chart is probably outdated by now, I assume. 

https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart-Rich-Hill.asp

https://overthecap.com/draft-trade-value-chart

this one is at least based on something real

45 (1071) -> 48 (1038) = 33 pts. We received 159 (431). An excess of 399 points = pick 169 surplus

48 (1038) -> 50 (1018) = 20 pts. We received 179 (371). An excess of 351 points = pick 186 surplus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, incognito_man said:

https://overthecap.com/draft-trade-value-chart

this one is at least based on something real

45 (1071) -> 48 (1038) = 33 pts. We received 159 (431). An excess of 399 points = pick 169 surplus

48 (1038) -> 50 (1018) = 20 pts. We received 179 (371). An excess of 351 points = pick 186 surplus

Either there's something I'm missing or that chart is way off... according to that you could move from 50 (1018) to 35 (1198) using mr Irrelevant (190). Doesn't seem aligned with what teams actually do.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Packer_ESP said:

Either there's something I'm missing or that chart is way off... according to that you could move from 50 (1018) to 35 (1198) using mr Irrelevant (190). Doesn't seem aligned with what teams actually do.

maybe they should do it. they might be better off!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Packer_ESP said:

Either there's something I'm missing or that chart is way off... according to that you could move from 50 (1018) to 35 (1198) using mr Irrelevant (190). Doesn't seem aligned with what teams actually do.

3 dimes = a dollar trade chart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...