candyman93 Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LETSGOBROWNIES Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 10 minutes ago, candyman93 said: He’s fine on the PS or on ST, but man I hope we don’t have to see him trying to cover anyone again. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candyman93 Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LETSGOBROWNIES Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 16 minutes ago, candyman93 said: No one claimed Ika lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candyman93 Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 7 minutes ago, LETSGOBROWNIES said: No one claimed Ika lol I think out of sheer pride he will be on the PS. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LETSGOBROWNIES Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 11 minutes ago, candyman93 said: I think out of sheer pride he will be on the PS. I’d be surprised personally. They have 4 on the active 53, plus Hall, plus Briggs I’d expect at DT. No room for Ika’s fat arse imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candyman93 Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LETSGOBROWNIES Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 3 minutes ago, candyman93 said: https://www.reddit.com/r/Browns/s/5mF09Mw6JS that’s the full list Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 The Browns have waved Bell. Will try and get him on p squad I imagine. He was the 53rd dude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brooks1957 Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 Correct me if I am wrong, prior to this move our roster was at 53, no? So waiving Bell leaves an open spot on the 53, correct? I also thought that our PS was maxed out at 17 - so if he is moved to the PS - a corresponding move must be made. Will it be Michael Woods to the active roster? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReggieCamp Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 4 hours ago, brooks1957 said: Correct me if I am wrong, prior to this move our roster was at 53, no? So waiving Bell leaves an open spot on the 53, correct? I also thought that our PS was maxed out at 17 - so if he is moved to the PS - a corresponding move must be made. Will it be Michael Woods to the active roster? We will certainly be bringing someone up. Could be Woods. Could be Proche, since he's a returner with speed. Could be Ifedi (backup OT) if Jed Wills can't go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.