Scoundrel Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 1 minute ago, Xmad said: Legit couldn't decide both gameplans are really good and counter each other really well. I can see the Anchorage d-line taking over this game if this gets away from Svalbard but I don't see how it does with their gameplan...........27-24 Svalbard with the upset here. Anchorage gives a damn good effort and fantastic gameplan but I'll say Burrow slumping IRL and their weaker skill positions eek this out for Svalbard. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 When you look at just the rosters alone, this might be the game of the week tbh. Great job on the gameplans, both of you. Svalbard over there with the Steelers defensive line makes it hard to go against, they definitely have the superior WR group I think, however, I do think it's the defensive side that determines this. I actually see this as a rather low scoring defensive struggle. 17-14 Anchorage with a late game INT. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 (edited) @SirA1 something I don't understand about your plan. You say lake is the STAR vs 11 personnel but Curl is the conductor of the defense. So who subs out for Lake? Cashman? Branch or Peppers? Or is it indeed Curl? EDIT: Oh nevermind it's one of the LBs isn't it? Edited September 11 by TedLavie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 (edited) 51 minutes ago, TedLavie said: @SirA1 something I don't understand about your plan. You say lake is the STAR vs 11 personnel but Curl is the conductor of the defense. So who subs out for Lake? Cashman? Branch or Peppers? Or is it indeed Curl? EDIT: Oh nevermind it's one of the LBs isn't it? It would be Zaven Collins spot. He won't be needed to set the edge in a Nickel/Dime. I tried to include pictures. lol Edited September 11 by SirA1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 7 minutes ago, SirA1 said: It would be Zaven Collins spot. He won't be needed to set the edge in a Nickel/Dime. I tried to include pictures. lol Yeah I focused on the picture after writing my message, hence the edit haha. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 No one asks me clarifying questions… 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 12 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: No one asks me clarifying questions… I'm reading through everything now, but one thing I'd suggest is putting Gonzalez in the slot instead of Stingley who has 20 snaps there in three seasons. He's a press boundary corner 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 1 hour ago, bcb1213 said: I'm reading through everything now, but one thing I'd suggest is putting Gonzalez in the slot instead of Stingley who has 20 snaps there in three seasons. He's a press boundary corner Already wrote my week 2 and this may or may not have been done… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 1 minute ago, Scoundrel said: Already wrote my week 2 and this may or may not have been done… Listening to me? what an alien concept.... ...I'll see myself out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 1 minute ago, bcb1213 said: Listening to me? what an alien concept.... ...I'll see myself out What part did you miss about I wrote it already… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 15 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: What part did you miss about I wrote it already… i mainly posted that for the alien pun 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 4 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: i mainly posted that for the alien pun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 SM i think executes just a tad better in the passing game than Anchorage and late in the game that will allow them to pull away 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 As a premise, like I said in the Greenland game, I judge off rookies as to what I saw on a NFL field. So for Rome for instance, as much as I liked him coming out, he’s had 11 yards in the NFL thus far and that’s what I’ll judge. I know this isn’t everyone’s thinking process, but that’s mine. With that being said, I think Anchorage youth doesn’t really matter here. I think their DL is leaps and bounds better than Svalbard OL and Dak is under duress all game long. With a very talented back 7 in zone behind, I think Dak struggles to get even to 150 yards and could be in for a pick or two. I do like the TEs on quick stuff in the middle of the field vs zone maybe. I do like Svalbard outside running prospects. Laporta vs Stingley in run blocking is a huge mismatch and Svalbard could get some running game going. Don’t know if that’s going to enough. On the other side, I love Svalbard defensive plan. Fun to read. And look Anchorage has not performed at a high level this week. And given the level of uncertainty on most of Anchorage skill group and QB, it’s not a good look. I do think however they have the OL to combat Svalbard strong defensive front. I think Breece has a decent game and in the end, with time in the pocket, Burrow will find Nabers/Njoku/Bowers at some point. This one is a defensive struggle. Anchorage looks a bit young at this stage of the season and I think an experienced Svalbard squad will give them fits. But in the end, I’ll take the teams I like more in the trenches and that’s Anchorage. Anchorage 17 - Svalbard 13 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedGold Posted September 11 Author Share Posted September 11 I’ve went back and forth on this one all day. In the end, I think both offenses are going to struggle in this one. Just a little too much youth on Anchorage right now to get over the lack of production, don’t see that lasting long though. Miners 17-13 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.