Hunter2_1 Posted June 6, 2018 Author Share Posted June 6, 2018 Wouldn't mind seeing a bit of Davis and Evans possibly in there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
showtime Posted June 6, 2018 Share Posted June 6, 2018 Why is Peters considered better than Whitworth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted June 6, 2018 Share Posted June 6, 2018 38 minutes ago, showtime said: Why is Peters considered better than Whitworth? https://www.profootballfocus.com/nfl/players/andrew-whitworth/3000 (#19) https://www.profootballfocus.com/nfl/players/jason-peters/2148 (#4) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
showtime Posted June 6, 2018 Share Posted June 6, 2018 18 minutes ago, Danger said: https://www.profootballfocus.com/nfl/players/andrew-whitworth/3000 (#19) https://www.profootballfocus.com/nfl/players/jason-peters/2148 (#4) That's supposed to mean something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted June 6, 2018 Share Posted June 6, 2018 Just now, showtime said: That's supposed to mean something? Nobody knows how PFF does their metrics. I will say this. Peters was arguably the best LT in the league last season before he got hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter2_1 Posted June 6, 2018 Author Share Posted June 6, 2018 PFF said they expect a fall-off soon from Whitworth, but not Peters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted June 6, 2018 Share Posted June 6, 2018 4 minutes ago, Hunter2_1 said: PFF said they expect a fall-off soon from Whitworth, but not Peters. Ironic considering Peters is coming off of a major knee injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVillain112 Posted June 6, 2018 Share Posted June 6, 2018 45 minutes ago, showtime said: That's supposed to mean something? Considering this is PFF's Top 10 list, yes. Joking aside, availability is a very underrated trait. When both are healthy and on the field, Jason Peters is the better OT no question. But seeing as how Whit is consistently on the field and Peters isn't, Whit has an argument to be placed higher... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAF-N72EX Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 10 hours ago, Hunter2_1 said: PFF said they expect a fall-off soon from Whitworth, but not Peters. PFF also said just last year that Wentz wasn't even worthy of making their "foundation draft" either while listing 15 others QB's - 2 of which hadn't even played a snap in the NFL. Would agree with that? https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-the-pff-foundation-draft-who-would-you-choose-to-start-a-franchise edit: Point is, consider the source before you believe anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAF-N72EX Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 9 hours ago, TheVillain112 said: Considering this is PFF's Top 10 list, yes. Joking aside, availability is a very underrated trait. When both are healthy and on the field, Jason Peters is the better OT no question. But seeing as how Whit is consistently on the field and Peters isn't, Whit has an argument to be placed higher... Agreed with both points. Peters and Whitworth have both been phenomenal but Whitworth has done more with less and has done it a higher rate of consistency with all thins considered. It don't matter how talented a player is if they're not on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 18 hours ago, TheVillain112 said: Considering this is PFF's Top 10 list, yes. Joking aside, availability is a very underrated trait. When both are healthy and on the field, Jason Peters is the better OT no question. But seeing as how Whit is consistently on the field and Peters isn't, Whit has an argument to be placed higher... This past season was the only season in Peter's 10 here that he's missed more than 2 games (in which the Eagles were trying to win) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter2_1 Posted June 7, 2018 Author Share Posted June 7, 2018 11 hours ago, JustAnotherFan said: PFF also said just last year that Wentz wasn't even worthy of making their "foundation draft" either while listing 15 others QB's - 2 of which hadn't even played a snap in the NFL. Would agree with that? https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-the-pff-foundation-draft-who-would-you-choose-to-start-a-franchise edit: Point is, consider the source before you believe anything. He's still down as third worst on adjusted completion %. Which, i believe, is taking away drops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 2 hours ago, Hunter2_1 said: He's still down as third worst on adjusted completion %. Which, i believe, is taking away drops That's in part because he was the most aggressive QB in the league (as a full time starter). Taking the most shots at closely guarded receivers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotsWin! Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 1. Brady 2. Rodgers (Will be 35 this year) 3. Brees 4. Fitzgerald 5. Roethlisberger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
43M Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 On 6/6/2018 at 2:59 PM, Danger said: https://www.profootballfocus.com/nfl/players/andrew-whitworth/3000 (#19) https://www.profootballfocus.com/nfl/players/jason-peters/2148 (#4) PFF is and always has been god awful at assessing OLine play (among other things). I still remember years back when they had Willie Colon rated as a top 3 OT, despite the fact he was playing mediocre at best. Im not trying to argue who was better between Whitworth and Peters since I didnt see enough of each to compare them head on, but I would trust the assessment of several posters on here over anything PFF has to say on the matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.