Jump to content

Bears could be interested in trading too much for Khalil Mack


cooters22

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, packfanfb said:

Told you, this **** is happening. He's getting traded, just a matter of whether it's us or some **** team with a lot of money and a potential top 5 pick next year. 

You're getting way ahead of yourself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jleisher said:

You would offer one #1 in 2019 and Daniels for Mack?

As much as Mack is better than Daniels, i don't want to trade him. His leadership is key to this team on defense. I would just trade picks right now. Hell I would do 2 firsts and a 2nd if the bidding war gets nuts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gopackgonerd said:

As much as Mack is better than Daniels, i don't want to trade him. His leadership is key to this team on defense. I would just trade picks right now. Hell I would do 2 firsts and a 2nd if the bidding war gets nuts. 

It has to be Clay cause of 52

(Clay would actually look bad@$$ in black and silver)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jleisher said:

Would you consider a #1 with Perry and Clinton-Dix for Mack and a #4?  Just throwing some off the wall thoughts out there.

Hard to know if Oakland wants players. 

I have to guess they want our two aces and that’s that. 

‘sides...I wanna see how HHCD foes under Pettine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, jleisher said:

You would offer one #1 in 2019 and Daniels for Mack?

I wouldn't be in favor of this. I'd rather trade extra draft picks before one of our better established players. The reason to get Mack is to win a Super Bowl now so it doesn't make sense to me to give up a player like Daniels. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, packfanfb said:

I wouldn't be in favor of this. I'd rather trade extra draft picks before one of our better established players. The reason to get Mack is to win a Super Bowl now so it doesn't make sense to me to give up a player like Daniels. 

Fair!  However, if the Raiders want the two #1 picks and the Packers only want to give up one.  To get a deal done, you have to offer something you normally wouldn't want to offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...