Xmad Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 6 minutes ago, Counselor said: Give me some examples Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 22 minutes ago, SwoleXmad said: That’s what I thought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Counselor said: That’s what I thought My 4th string QB had a better statline than your starter in week 1. I got depth. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 Just now, SwoleXmad said: My 4th string QB had a better statline than your starter in week 1. I got depth. Let’s use Cousins least productive game ever as the example. You’re a clown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 I’ll take the 80% completion percentage every day clown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Counselor said: I’ll take the 80% completion percentage every day clown. My 4th stringer had 88%. 3 minutes ago, Counselor said: Let’s use Cousins least productive game ever as the example. You’re a clown So you admit it. lc'mon man you know I'm just messing with you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 9 minutes ago, SwoleXmad said: My 4th stringer had 88%. So you admit it. lc'mon man you know I'm just messing with you. The one you just picked up and can’t trade? Yeah you are intelligent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 We hit midseason salt levels quick this year. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 1 hour ago, ny92mike said: Every vote by someone else is their own opinion in how they view the lineup and the game plan. So essentially every vote has some sort of bias attached to it. I didn't vote in your matchup but I would have voted for Portland because I think their lineup executed irl better this week. I only voted in the one matchup that Camden showed up and their opponent didn't, but just looking at your lineup it would have been really hard to vote against Portland, they simply had the better team this week because I tend to look at irl stats. I was originally going to say that your starting running backs did nothing this week but after reading your game plan, I see you made the change to McCoy (good move) but it didn't help my evaluation process when I read that you "plan to use a heavy rotation at RB" which puts those guys back in the discussion for me. Your second receiver, and again after reading the game plan I see that he's the slot receiver now, did very little on the field last week which wouldn't big a big deal because both Brown and Cobb did well but you running a 3-4 wide set the entire game puts him on the field for the bulk of the game. He caught 1 pass for 5 yards. Even Big Ben had a rough game last week On defense, you come out in man coverage with single high over the top. Your starter on the edge, Davon Godchaux has a total of one sack in his 3 year career. Even Big Ben had a bad game, throwing for 276 yards / 0 TD / 1 INT. So please don't confuse what I said with simply voting on "big names" when I mentioned Mahomes and McCaffrey having big games. I could have easily went the other way if your guys put up those kind of numbers. My point is that you can have a great game plan but the players have to be able to produce irl as well. It just wasn't a great week for the players on the roster, that's all. As for the game plans being too long and not reading them. Look, I like your writing style, and would have been happy to read more of it. You didn't really talk your offensive plan up enough imo. Now do I want to read 4 pages absolutely not, because I think that much detail just becomes muddy with contradictions. Tl/dr. (sorry that was too easy) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 (edited) 41 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: Tl/dr. (sorry that was too easy) So was your mom. Edited September 14, 2019 by ny92mike 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 47 minutes ago, ny92mike said: So was your mom. Let's leave moms out of this and I'll leave this out of your mom 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 You guys see why Rome is easy to have as a rival. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 2 hours ago, Counselor said: The one you just picked up and can’t trade? Yeah you are intelligent. I'll have you know I am very intellgent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 15 minutes ago, SwoleXmad said: I'll have you know I am very intellgent. I know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 37 minutes ago, SwoleXmad said: I'll have you know I am very intellgent. You spelled intelligent wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts