bcb1213 Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 9 minutes ago, Counselor said: If y’all going to veto my trade don’t expect me to participate any longer more than draft and free agency. I won’t be trading anymore or commenting on the board or posting mocks or anything. I’ll keep it just business if that’s how we want to go about it. WW isn’t a rookie he does Gm mocks. for the record, i'm not saying we should veto anything, but let the guy have some time to get accustomed to the rules a bit. I'm sure whatever is fine just i know he still has some questions via PM i'm trying to answer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Just now, SwoleXmad said: Mahomes had 3 starts under his belt, it was a gamble. Also not relevant when we're talking about allowing an owner who has been in the league not even 24 hours to trade. He isn’t a new gm to me though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 I'm so happy I resigned from the trade committee. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Just now, bcb1213 said: for the record, i'm not saying we should veto anything, but let the guy have some time to get accustomed to the rules a bit. I'm sure whatever is fine just i know he still has some questions via PM i'm trying to answer You are more professional about it appreciate it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Just now, Ragnarok said: I'm so happy I resigned from the trade committee. if i can fake being in it again for a year, you can too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted February 18, 2019 Author Share Posted February 18, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Counselor said: Crying? And here we go? It’s this type of treating the owners in this league that will push people out. edit: all good Edited February 18, 2019 by Jlash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Just now, Jlash said: You just threatened to quit again, for what the 5th time? After a few people expressed concern over letting someone still get a handle on the league make deals, not necessarily the validity of the trade. So to me, that constituted crying and hence my 'here we go'. I didn’t threaten to quit at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 2 minutes ago, Counselor said: You are more professional about it appreciate it you might want to write this down for the record books Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted February 18, 2019 Author Share Posted February 18, 2019 Just now, Counselor said: I didn’t threaten to quit at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Regardless of perceived fairness of a trade, I do think that it is wise to let new people get used to trading mechanisms and how value is perceived here. I would recommend at least having them look through old trades so that they get a sense for what value is. IIRC, Mike Evans went for a 1st not too long ago, so the optics of an established owner acquiring such a player for a lowered cost is not ideal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 I canceled my trade. Have a good day guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Lol guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted February 18, 2019 Author Share Posted February 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Ragnarok said: Regardless of perceived fairness of a trade, I do think that it is wise to let new people get used to trading mechanisms and how value is perceived here. I would recommend at least having them look through old trades so that they get a sense for what value is. IIRC, Mike Evans went for a 1st not too long ago, so the optics of an established owner acquiring such a player for a lowered cost is not ideal. Is Mike Williams that good though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Just now, Jlash said: Is Mike Williams that good though? That's what I meant by perceived fairness of a trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Obligatory mention of @Whicker after the word quitting has been said I don't think Mike Williams is that good, but a low 2nd rounder would be a more fair value, imho. Still, it's not as egregious as other trades we had in the past 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts