TedLavie Posted March 21, 2019 Author Share Posted March 21, 2019 Still waiting for votes or confirmation from @Whicker @BringinDaPain @Jlash @MD4L Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringinDaPain Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 Prop 4 - Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 I vote prop 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 @TedLavie I'll switch to Prop 4 as that solves my Week 17 issue and the 12 game schedule is not getting traction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey5djh Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 @Jlash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 12 minutes ago, Hockey5djh said: @Jlash I'll vote no change because as I've stated I think starting our regular season in the preseason is a terrible idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey5djh Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 59 minutes ago, Jlash said: I'll vote no change because as I've stated I think starting our regular season in the preseason is a terrible idea. The solo vote to not ruffle any feathers? Scum move. Jlash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted March 21, 2019 Author Share Posted March 21, 2019 So we have 1 vote for P1, 3 for P2, 6 for P3, 4 for P4 and 1 for P5 P1 and P5 can't win and SirA already revoted on P4 (which now sits at 5). So now P2 can't win either. So I'll ask @Jlash @pheltzbahr and @Hockey5djh to revote, in addition to @MD4L . I have to revote as well, and I can't decide between the fact that P3 doesn't fix w17 and the fact that P4 has 2 games in preseason, which I absolutely hate. I'll think about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 IMO games in the preseason will just factor in Game plans more for me. That's not a bad thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 @TedLavie @Jlash Why is the preseason game a terrible idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey5djh Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 On 3/19/2019 at 5:50 PM, TedLavie said: Detailed idea 1. Reduce to 12 games, start in preseason week 4 (no w17, no Thanksgiving, no Christmas) 2. Reduce to 12 games, start week 1 (no thanksgiving, no w17) 3. Stick with 14 games, start in preseason week 4 (no Thanksgiving) 4. Stick with 14 games start in preseason week 3 (no Thanksgiving no w17) 5. No change Argument for : Would avoid all week 17 controversies (players who are helthy scratches ...), and would allow by weeks for Thanksgiving and Christmas Applicable on: 2019 Prop 1 (0) - Prop 2 (3) - Ted, hockey, pheltz Prop 3 (6) - Rags, Lukic, Counselor, Ruskie, bcb, wwhicock Prop 4 (5) - PR, Xmad, BDP, Whicker, SirA Prop 5 (1) - Jlash Kinda dumb if you ask me. 3 and 4 both have the same issue with preseason games and player eligibility that Week 17 has. Realistically it should just be removed altogether so there's no guesswork. @SirA1 was on 2, @Jlash has openly said 3 and 4 are his worst options. I think if push comes to shove the vote should be between 2 and 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringinDaPain Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 Prop 2 - Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 Prop 5 for the record, a week 3 preseason opening season is brutal. We normally have shark tank around that time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey5djh Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 Just now, MD4L said: @TedLavie @Jlash Why is the preseason game a terrible idea? Quote 3 and 4 have the same issue with preseason games and player eligibility that Week 17 has I know its better to have uncertainty in Game 1/2 of the season than in the Bizz Bowl but there's a TON of guesswork being done for not only rosters/starting spots but also how players will perform in these spots, potentially with a new team, potentially in a new position. Essentially it will force people to go solely on name recognition and previous history for the first week or two rather than actual fit and performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 I was always on Prop 1 before moving to Prop 4 because Prop 1 was my proposal. You'll get enough of play in P3 games to use for P3 and P4 IMO. I'd rather have uncertainty early in the season versus controversy again for the championship game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.