Jump to content

Overwatch Mafia 2.0 - Game Over - The Six Stack Wins!!!


Whicker

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Whicker said:

All it means is that the people who attacked Malf in the writeup (Danger, Woz, Rack, Forge, and Swag) are in the writeup because they voted for Malf, not because of any associations that may have had otherwise.

So the line about flavor ONLY dealt with the lynch? Not the kills?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Day 2

1. ET - McCree (Split Triple Voter)

2. Gopher - Lucio (1-shot Multiple Loverizer) Dome (91)

3. Dome – Doomfist (2-shot Vigilante)

5. Tk3 – Pharah (Bus Driver)Dome (93)

7. Flacco – Zarya (Non-Consecutive Doctor)

8. Rack – Widowmaker (Watcher)Dome (92)

10. Woz – Mei (2-shot Lynchproof)

11. Matts – D.Va (Lynchproof Maker)

12. Fin – Junkrat (Vengeful Vigilante)

14. Danger – Reinhardt (1-shot Multiple Roleblocker) – Dome (92)

16. Rick – Mercy (1-shot Governor)

17. Rag – Hanzo (Tracker) – Dome (95)

18. Mwil – Zenyatta (Loverizer/Haterizer) – Gopher (91)

19. James – Winston (Odd-night Jailkeeper)

20. Bcb – Moira (Strong Loverizer)

21. Naz – Reaper (2-shot Commuter)

22. Touch – Orisa (1-shot Vote Motivator) – Dome (92)

23. Counselor – Baptiste (1-shot Multiple Governor) – Flacco (91), Dome (92)

24. Squire – Soldier 76 (Vanilla Townie) – Dome (93)

 

Vote Count (10 to lynch)
8 Dome – Gopher, Counselor, Rack, Danger, Touch, Squire, Tk3, Rag
1 Gopher – Mwil

(-2) Rack – (Moira), (Moira)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rackcs said:

Not sure why people are so intent on poking holes in this. I chose to watch swag. Swag was targeted by mwil and dome. There is no reason for dome to have targeted swag with positive intentions and if he were redirected I think he would've already claimed so. I'm not sure how the scum faction kill works but again, I see no pro-town reasons for dome to visit swag last night.

unless he was town vig and had a bad read on Swag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, rackcs said:

Also, much more concretely, dome was nano boosted by ana aka malf who is now confirmed scum. Dome is absolutely 100% scum.

Except Malf was lynched before night started bro 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rackcs said:

By the way, your objections have been absolutely noted. It doesn't make you automatic scum but it doesn't look good.

Who are you talking to? You quoted yourself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rackcs said:

That fact that people are defending dome is baffling to me. Either you're incompetent scum for defending a sure fire lynched scum buddy or you're incompetent town attacking an easy lynch.

Bro, that's like 90% of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, squire12 said:

Then why didnt you just answer the question?

 

1 minute ago, rackcs said:

I did answer, I just misunderstood the question. I thought you were asking if dome could've been redirected. Either way my point stands that I would've mentioned if I was redirected.

Lots of idiots here have unintentionally omitted or accidentally misrepresented their information which led people to wrong conclusions

Squire was just asking for clarity, knowing that there are roles that allow for that sort of thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rackcs said:

That fact that people are defending dome is baffling to me. Either you're incompetent scum for defending a sure fire lynched scum buddy or you're incompetent town attacking an easy lynch.

nobody is attacking anything

I'm trying to gain clarity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tk3 said:

unless he was town vig and had a bad read on Swag

As far as I can see he never indicated that in thread. Also if he were town vig you'd think he'd be defending himself in any way?

Just now, bcb1213 said:

Except Malf was lynched before night started bro 

But he could've sent in his PM before night started as whicker was asking for the Pms before then. I think he likely did send it in and then went offline before the lynch happened. He probably thought he was safe. 

Just now, Matts4313 said:

Who are you talking to? You quoted yourself. 

It was just an addendum to my previous comment and meant generally to those defending him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...