Jump to content

Yo-ho yo-ho, a Pirates Life for Me! - Day 6 is now! - Night 6 starts at 6pm EST


Dome

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheKillerNacho said:

You do know "can" is past/present-tense, right? I didn't say that no one would be able to verify it, merely that no one has done so, at this time, and thus he has no alibi.

Yeah, Nacho, don't try English games with me when whining about semantics.  Since night actions came and went hours ago, everyone who could verify the roleblock currently possesses the means to verify it, even if they're absent.  In other words: you're wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nazgul said:

Doesn't mean they aren't either. With that said, if I am being deceived here I lose 10/10 times.
Mason seems like a role based on trust. If that starts as a lie I don't know how a "useful idiot" (as you so kindly put it) like myself, could recover.

Well, you could start by thinking for yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SwAg said:

Yeah, I read it properly.  You're not taking a stance on it, you're only supplying a rationale that permits you to go both ways.  If it's advantageous to use the tricorder or if momentum demands it, then you can say X, if not, you can say Y.

You're not fooling anyone with that "may or may not" nonsense.

Yar, you be givin' me much too much credit on the amount of intrigue I be capable of. Did it ever cross yer mind that I just be very indecisive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Llamalover said:

Yar, you be givin' me much too much credit on the amount of intrigue I be capable of. Did it ever cross yer mind that I just be very indecisive?

Yep, and coupled with the rest, seems less likely since it is incongruent to last game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Malfatron said:

no. you were right.

i could have called out naz/nacho is likely masons, and maybe we coulda got some different night results

I mean - I was basically shouting being a mason with Nacho without confirming it.
I thought I was being blatantly obvious.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Malfatron said:

no. you were right.

i could have called out naz/nacho is likely masons, and maybe we coulda got some different night results

Yeah, I'm saying that you're going to give him a pass as clueless Town for that action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SwAg said:

Yeah, Nacho, don't try English games with me when whining about semantics.  Since night actions came and went hours ago, everyone who could verify the roleblock currently possesses the means to verify it, even if they're absent.  In other words: you're wrong.

9_9

whatever you say, scum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...