rackcs Posted November 22, 2019 Author Share Posted November 22, 2019 37 minutes ago, daboyle250 said: Mines is better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daboyle Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 13 minutes ago, rackcs said: Mines is better Fair 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 15 minutes ago, rackcs said: Mines is better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadpulse Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 5 minutes ago, MWil23 said: fun fact, that's God lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 1 minute ago, Deadpulse said: fun fact, that's God lol ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 18 minutes ago, Daniel said: Nice. Freeman is like the least woke black actor out there, so that's surprising, but who knows. In his younger days, maybe though. I guess someone like Lawrence Fishburn could be Runciter, and Don Cheadle could be a decent Ashwood, but Law (in my head) is a pretty critical piece of cast cohesion, since he's worked closely with Downey Jr. on a couple films and with Gilliam and Portman on one each. I imagine that, if this film were really being made, it'd be good to have that close a cast of central characters. I guess Skarsgard does that too, but I feel like he had very minor roles in the Marvel movies that Downey was in. And right now, I'm pretty proud of the amount of actors I have that have collaborated before, often and recently. It might actually have been Fishburne who said it now that I think about it. And it's like... it really bothers me. Childs is like right up there in the top 10 greatest movie characters ever. "Which makes you a murderer, don't it?" Perfect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 Crap. @daboyle250, hang onto that poster you made. I just realized I haven’t named Matt Milne’s character anything other than Matt Milne. I’ll let you know when I have the final lineup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadpulse Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 1 hour ago, MWil23 said: ? Supernatural Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 So far, daboyle's project has me the most excited. A Villenueve Bond movie with that cast sounds legiiiit. That said, I only know what three of you are doing. Everyone else: get your stuff in gear and get these hype trains going. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 I think I might have a teaser trailer description for everybody tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 1 hour ago, Daniel said: So far, daboyle's project has me the most excited. A Villenueve Bond movie with that cast sounds legiiiit. That said, I only know what three of you are doing. Everyone else: get your stuff in gear and get these hype trains going. I'm pretty sure more than 3 have revealed what they are doing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 I’m following what I like to call a Copper precedent. I’ll explain once I post my movie. If y’all haven’t seen The Thing, you better watch it before you vote. Also following the Palmer/Norris precedents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rackcs Posted November 23, 2019 Author Share Posted November 23, 2019 1 hour ago, Outpost31 said: I’m following what I like to call a Copper precedent. I’ll explain once I post my movie. If y’all haven’t seen The Thing, you better watch it before you vote. Also following the Palmer/Norris precedents. You're talking about the one with Mary Elizabeth Winstead, right? That is the good one after all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 16 minutes ago, rackcs said: You're talking about the one with Mary Elizabeth Winstead, right? That is the good one after all. I don’t get why people think it gets to me when they talk **** about The Thing. I know how good it is. I don’t need to convince anyone how good it is. The one with Winstead was painfully alright. Had a lot of potential, but it devolved into an ordinary monster movie for the final third of the movie. There were some really good moments, and the CGI wasn’t that bad. I don’t hate it. I even own it. I certainly don’t consider it canon, but I can also make an argument for it being canon and not ruining anything about The Thing. After all, The Thing could have learned how to FAKE assimilating inorganic material. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 What I like about my version is that they cannot disclose from where the dog came. Therefore, they will not be able to go to a different camp to get any hints or clues about what’s going on and they’ll have to piece it all together out of context while dealing with an otherworldly threat they don’t even know is otherworldly. They just happen to get really lucky and get a break due to an accident. It also in no way, shape or form interferes with or changes the classic 82 version as it takes place at exactly the same time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.