Jump to content

BDL Discussion Thread 2020


TedLavie

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Counselor said:

Your boy The Counselor would like to either trade 3.14 with a 2021 3rd to move up or trade 3.14 and 3.15 to move up. I’ve miscalculated some things!

Depending on how the board falls I might be willing to do that with 2.16 when the time comes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Counselor said:

When they said want to do a three way I thought they were paying for me and 2 women... to have a Skype convo.

We can't get one woman for you and you're expecting two?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lancaster gives up: OBJ, 3.15 (430 + OBJ[~1300])
SacTown gives up: 1.15, 3.9, 4.3, 5.4 (2180)
Berlin gives up: 1.11, 3.14 (1690)

Lancaster gets: 1.15, 3.9, 5.4 (1790)
SacTown gets: 1.11, 3.14, 3.15 (2120)
Berlin: OBJ, 4.3 (390 + OBJ[~1300])

Math-wise from the trade value chart the trade was essentially even if you consider OBJ worth roughly 1300 points or so, which is 1.10. Which is not a crazy valuation for OBJ.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rackcs said:

Lancaster gives up: OBJ, 3.15 (430 + OBJ[~1300])
SacTown gives up: 1.15, 3.9, 4.3, 5.4 (2180)
Berlin gives up: 1.11, 3.14 (1690)

Lancaster gets: 1.15, 3.9, 5.4 (1790)
SacTown gets: 1.11, 3.14, 3.15 (2120)
Berlin: OBJ, 4.3 (390 + OBJ[~1300])

Math-wise from the trade value chart the trade was essentially even if you consider OBJ worth roughly 1300 points or so, which is 1.10. Which is not a crazy valuation for OBJ.

If I hadn't valued him that high, I wouldn't have done it.

A functional OL and offensive system should help this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...