Jump to content

BDL Discussion Thread 2022


Jlash

Recommended Posts

Waiver/Draft Order After Week 9

1. Berlin 1-8(1-3) -71
2. Seoul 2-7(2-2) -56
3. Gotham 2-7(0-4) -64
4. Hungary 2-7(1-3) -34
5. Singapore 3-6(1-3) -44
6. Raleigh 4-5(1-3) -16
7. Greenland 4-5(1-3) -1
8. Cuba 4-5(2-2) -20
9. Lancaster 5-4(2-2) +11
10. Ivory Coast 5-4(3-1) +8
11. Death Valley 5-3-1(2-1-1) +13
12. Flint 6-3(2-2) +55
13. Cancun 6-2-1(2-1-1) +33
14. Rome 7-2(3-1) +60
15. Anchorage 7-2(4-0) +74
16. Camden 8-1(4-0) +58

Edited by LAOJoe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, LAOJoe said:

1. Berlin 1-8(1-3)- CJ Stroud QB OSU
2. Seoul 2-7(2-2)- Bryce Young QB Bama
3. Gotham 2-7(0-4) - Will Anderson Jr Edge Bama
4. Hungary 2-7(1-3) - Jalen Carter INT UGA
5. Anchorage (from) Singapore 3-6(1-3) - Kelee Ringo CB UGA
6. Raleigh 4-5(1-3) - Jordan Addison WR USC
7. Greenland 4-5(1-3) - Bijan Robinson RB Texas
8. Cuba 4-5(2-2) - Joey Porter Jr CB PSU
9. Raleigh (from) Lancaster 5-4(2-2) - Jaxon Smith-Njigba WR OSU
10. Berlin (from) Ivory Coast 5-4(3-1) - Myles Murphy Edge Clemson
11. Gotham (from) Death Valley 5-3-1(2-1-1) - Peter Skoronski OL NW
12. Flint 6-3(2-2) - Quentin Johnston WR TCU
13. Cancun 6-2-1(2-1-1) - Christian Gonzalez CB Oregon
14. Rome 7-2(3-1) - Michael Mayer TE ND
15. Anchorage 7-2(4-0) - Isaiah Foskey Edge ND
16. IC (from) Camden 8-1(4-0) - Bryan Bresee INT Clemson

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bcb1213 said:

@LAOJoe I sent in a waiver last night but it appears you had deleted the convo. Will post screen shot in discord 

Well this is ******* great considering that guy was claimed.

I saw your screenshot on Discord. I don't see enough proof in that. I'll need the whole page at least. I don't see my name or anything else but your reply.

I deleted all my old PMs as I was near the limit. Isn't it supposed to rejoin me in the convo if you resend me a PM? That's what happened before with someone else. And if that isn't always the case, considering our known inbox limits, and doing this job before wouldn't you know best not to send with an old message?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Show me proof it was sent at least. If it can be proved it was in I can at least award the 2nd option.

Maybe gotta stick some new ground rules that waivers need to be a new PM BC of inbox limits and also for teams to write their damn team names so it's super easy to get them done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...