Jump to content

If you use "he's a product of the team around him" as an argument to discredit a QB, your argument is invalid


biggie.

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, MrOaktown_56 said:

Yeah you’re saying he’s better than mediocre backup quarterbacks so I agree. Hardly a ringing endorsement.

If he's just a bad QB that's a mere product of the team around him surely SF would win just as much with him out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, SkippyX said:

To revisit Dak after the apology.

1 - The play call and execution was Chuck Pagano fake punt level stupid.

2 - Blaming the refs was pathetic

3 - Wigging out in the press conference was really bad

4 - not taking it back when given the chance was awful

5 - apologizing after cooling down was expected and necessary. He's not a hero for a tweet 2 days later but its way better than not apologizing at all.

 

He's not as bad as he was on Sunday. He doesn't have to be defined by this week.

He's not as good as he was vs the plague WFT and the Eagles backups.

He's still Dak. (top 8, top 10, top 14, based on personal taste)

Aren't you an Eagles fan? 

Cause you're not supposed to have spot-on takes like this about the Cowboys lol.

Couldn't type it any better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...