3rivers Posted October 20, 2023 Share Posted October 20, 2023 1 hour ago, August4th said: they just cut gunner HOF coaches would have cut him after those bad games he had Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jebrick Posted October 20, 2023 Share Posted October 20, 2023 58 minutes ago, 3rivers said: HOF coaches would have cut him after those bad games he had I would have cut him at /2 time of the Cleveland game. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rivers Posted October 20, 2023 Share Posted October 20, 2023 3 minutes ago, jebrick said: I would have cut him at /2 time of the Cleveland game. how can we get you to coach the steelers? I am tired of how this staff handles the roster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
43M Posted October 24, 2023 Share Posted October 24, 2023 Its funny seeing how happy Eagles fans are after trade Terrell Edmunds. They said he was terrible in coverage and an unreliable tackler, which pretty much mimicked my feelings of him the majority of his time here. That being said, I would take him back right now just because he was a decent compliment to Minkah and better than what we have now....but Ive seen Steeler fans talk him up as if he was actually good for us, when he was actually extremely mediocre most of the time, but we settled for it because we have gotten used to poor safety play since Troy left, and he was a marginal upgrade. It would be nice to see us get a semi decent box safety next to Minkah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warfelg Posted October 24, 2023 Author Share Posted October 24, 2023 2 hours ago, 43M said: Its funny seeing how happy Eagles fans are after trade Terrell Edmunds. They said he was terrible in coverage and an unreliable tackler, which pretty much mimicked my feelings of him the majority of his time here. That being said, I would take him back right now just because he was a decent compliment to Minkah and better than what we have now....but Ive seen Steeler fans talk him up as if he was actually good for us, when he was actually extremely mediocre most of the time, but we settled for it because we have gotten used to poor safety play since Troy left, and he was a marginal upgrade. It would be nice to see us get a semi decent box safety next to Minkah. I talk him up only because I feel his positional flexibility and box play made him a perfect complement for Minkah. He allowed Minkah to be Minkah. I think the issue is the way the Eagles used him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
43M Posted October 24, 2023 Share Posted October 24, 2023 7 minutes ago, warfelg said: I talk him up only because I feel his positional flexibility and box play made him a perfect complement for Minkah. He allowed Minkah to be Minkah. I think the issue is the way the Eagles used him. Not disagreeing really...but I still feel like there is alot of room for improvement. Still, as I said, Id take him back right now, for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warfelg Posted October 24, 2023 Author Share Posted October 24, 2023 22 minutes ago, 43M said: Not disagreeing really...but I still feel like there is alot of room for improvement. Still, as I said, Id take him back right now, for sure. There is. I feel like he was a good floor and we went to the basement for the safety rotation. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armsteeld Posted October 24, 2023 Share Posted October 24, 2023 Issue with Edmunds is that he's a WLB playing Safety. I remember the Edmunds that was always a step late in coverage allowing those deep shots. Honestly I don't see any room for him as Neal has been solid covering TEs & playing inside the box. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jebrick Posted October 24, 2023 Share Posted October 24, 2023 15 minutes ago, armsteeld said: Issue with Edmunds is that he's a WLB playing Safety. I remember the Edmunds that was always a step late in coverage allowing those deep shots. Honestly I don't see any room for him as Neal has been solid covering TEs & playing inside the box. He is another attempt to have that mythical SS/ILB hybrid. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MOSteelers56 Posted October 24, 2023 Share Posted October 24, 2023 Don't look now, but we've got a lot of winnable games the rest of the way out. The only one I feel like we're destined to lose is the Seattle game. I'd give us a puncher's chance in all of the others. Obviously I don't think we will win them all, but we're not outclassed by anyone left on the schedule. Seattle isn't a lot better than us, I just don't like the idea of going across the country to play there. But, who knows, we went to LV and LA and won. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jebrick Posted October 24, 2023 Share Posted October 24, 2023 14 minutes ago, MOSteelers56 said: Don't look now, but we've got a lot of winnable games the rest of the way out. The only one I feel like we're destined to lose is the Seattle game. I'd give us a puncher's chance in all of the others. Obviously I don't think we will win them all, but we're not outclassed by anyone left on the schedule. Seattle isn't a lot better than us, I just don't like the idea of going across the country to play there. But, who knows, we went to LV and LA and won. They have already won games that they should have lost and lost one game they should have won. They have 4 games vs bottom feeders. Figure they will win 3 of them. They have 3 games vs mid tier teams. Could go either way. I think 3 games vs top level teams which i would expect them to lose. 9-8 or 8-9 would be where I expect them. 10-7 would be possible if they play very well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MOSteelers56 Posted October 24, 2023 Share Posted October 24, 2023 2 minutes ago, jebrick said: They have already won games that they should have lost and lost one game they should have won. They have 4 games vs bottom feeders. Figure they will win 3 of them. They have 3 games vs mid tier teams. Could go either way. I think 3 games vs top level teams which i would expect them to lose. 9-8 or 8-9 would be where I expect them. 10-7 would be possible if they play very well. Who are the bottom feeders? Colts, Cards, Pats? If so, I like our odds since they're all at home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jebrick Posted October 24, 2023 Share Posted October 24, 2023 2 minutes ago, MOSteelers56 said: Who are the bottom feeders? Colts, Cards, Pats? If so, I like our odds since they're all at home. titans Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MOSteelers56 Posted October 24, 2023 Share Posted October 24, 2023 1 minute ago, jebrick said: titans Also at home weirdly enough. Seems like we're in Pittsburgh a ton in the upcoming weeks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jebrick Posted October 24, 2023 Share Posted October 24, 2023 1 minute ago, MOSteelers56 said: Also at home weirdly enough. Seems like we're in Pittsburgh a ton in the upcoming weeks. Packers and Bengalsx2 are mid tier Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.