ReasonablySober Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 6 minutes ago, Old Guy said: You want to see an interesting conversation about people from the inside, google the Tucker Carlson and Chris Cuomo sit down. Just kill me instead. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainmaker90 Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 🤣🤣🤣Personally, I’m all for it! Really hope it happens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 5 minutes ago, Old Guy said: Your point was Biden didn't have anything to do with it. Your point was wrong. Wrong again. Let's stick with the facts. The people making the decision: "The law says it’s up to the secretary of Homeland Security, after consulting with a bipartisan committee of House and Senate leaders, to decide who counts as a “major” candidate" Biden is none of those roles. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Striker Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 3 minutes ago, Rainmaker90 said: 🤣🤣🤣Personally, I’m all for it! Really hope it happens And then he picks Jordan Rodgers instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 1 minute ago, Striker said: And then he picks Jordan Rodgers instead. Alex Smith 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 I find the WI and MN connections interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Striker Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 2 minutes ago, incognito_man said: Alex Smith Rodgers then sides with Biden or Trump just to spite RFK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StatKing Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 44 minutes ago, Striker said: It's funny that folks on the right think CNN is some far left (or even left leaning) news organization when they have basically tanked their network in their desperate attempts to garner views from an audience that still doesn't tune in despite them trying to create some sort of artificial centrism. It's also funny that folks believe that Tapper would recklessly report something without some trust in his sources. Of all those working at CNN, he's been pretty damn consistent with his fact checking. ...also, is it really that much of a stretch that Mr. 9/11, COVID vaccine, chemtrail, UFO, Epstein conspiracy guy would also buy into the Sandy Hook conspiracies? Or are his various teammates just lying about that too because...? I'm sure the timing of this article has nothing to do with RFK announcing Rodgers as a possible VP pick. It's way more believable that Aaron Rodgers was talking to some no name reporter at the Kentucky Derby over a decade ago and just now out of the blue she remembers him mentioning Sandy Hook was fake. The media never does hit pieces, they all strive for the absolute truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 3 minutes ago, Striker said: Rodgers then sides with Biden or Trump just to spite RFK. He runs with Rogan as his veep and steals all RFKs voters 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kampfgeist Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 1 minute ago, StatKing said: I'm sure the timing of this article has nothing to do with RFK announcing Rodgers as a possible VP pick. It's way more believable that Aaron Rodgers was talking to some no name reporter at the Kentucky Derby over a decade ago and just now out of the blue she remembers him mentioning Sandy Hook was fake. The media never does hit pieces, they all strive for the absolute truth. Trying to make sense of this -- In your opinion it's not a problem someone would mention Sandy Hook being fake - the real problem is a reporter bringing it up from some years ago? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 1 minute ago, StatKing said: I'm sure the timing of this article has nothing to do with RFK announcing Rodgers as a possible VP pick. It's way more believable that Aaron Rodgers was talking to some no name reporter at the Kentucky Derby over a decade ago and just now out of the blue she remembers him mentioning Sandy Hook was fake. The media never does hit pieces, they all strive for the absolute truth. More likely: The Derby discussion was between to people enjoying the day and remained private - as it should have - but once the guy's slated as a potential VP pick - it becomes far more topical and of public interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 5 minutes ago, Leader said: More likely: The Derby discussion was between to people enjoying the day and remained private - as it should have - but once the guy's slated as a potential VP pick - it becomes far more topical and of public interest. Yep. Of course it came out now because of the VP announcement. That's how this works and why RFK did the soft launch. To gauge the blowback on what's all in Aaron's closet before it's official. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Striker Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 8 minutes ago, incognito_man said: He runs with Rogan as his veep and steals all RFKs voters Rodgers/Rogan vs. RFK/Ventura at Wrestlemania for all the votes with McAfee on the call. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StatKing Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 5 minutes ago, Leader said: More likely: The Derby discussion was between to people enjoying the day and remained private - as it should have - but once the guy's slated as a potential VP pick - it becomes far more topical and of public interest. More likely: She made it up. You're literally defending ****ty journalism when you say she took an off the record conversation and made it public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 Just now, StatKing said: More likely: She made it up. You're literally defending ****ty journalism when you say she took an off the record conversation and made it public. Pamela Brown's not some "no name" journalist. She has a high profile / career and I *highly doubt* she'd pull this out of her *** for clicks and giggles. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts