Jump to content

Super Bowl 60 to Santa Clara


pf9

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, pf9 said:

Still, Cleveland should have first dibs on 61 because of how long it has been since the last NFL playoff game in the city.

This feels like a good compromise for all parties.

https://www.cleveland.com/business/2020/02/cleveland-to-host-super-bowl-of-meetings-in-2024-american-society-of-association-executives.html#:~:text=CLEVELAND%2C Ohio — For the first,the convention and meetings industry.

I’m sorry, it just doesn’t make sense. It’s an outdoor stadium where it’s freezing at night. In one of the “older” stadiums next to the new wonders of the world. It’s the 7th smallest nfl metro. It’s not a top tourist destination compared to a New Orleans. Cleveland is a great sports town, but it just doesn’t make sense for the NFL to host their biggest event.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, time to face the facts. Here's each current NFL market and the last time they hosted a playoff game (home game for tenants or Super Bowl), listed by what calendar year most, if not all, of the regular season took place in.

Cleveland: 1994
Detroit: 2005 (Super Bowl)
New York City: 2013 (Super Bowl)
Indianapolis: 2014
Charlotte: 2015
Denver: 2015
Atlanta: 2018 (Super Bowl)
Chicago: 2018
Baltimore: 2019
Boston: 2019
Houston: 2019
Miami: 2019 (Super Bowl)
New Orleans: 2020
Pittsburgh: 2020
Seattle: 2020
Washington: 2020
Dallas: 2021
Green Bay: 2021
Los Angeles: 2021 (Super Bowl)
Nashville: 2021
Buffalo: 2022
Cincinnati: 2022
Jacksonville: 2022
Kansas City: 2022
Minneapolis-St. Paul: 2022
Philadelphia: 2022
Phoenix: 2022 (Super Bowl)
San Francisco: 2022
Tampa: 2022

As you can see, Cleveland has gone longer without hosting an NFL playoff game of any sort than any other city currently with an NFL team. The next longest drought is more than a decade shorter. Clevelanders have suffered long enough. The city needs to be awarded Super Bowl 61 in case the Browns don't get a home playoff game in the next few seasons. And notice that Cleveland is the only drought that dates back to the 20th century. Every other market has hosted a playoff game in the 21st.

Edited by pf9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pf9 said:

Alright, time to face the facts. Here's each current NFL market and the last time they hosted a playoff game (home game for tenants or Super Bowl), listed by what calendar year most, if not all, of the regular season took place in.

Cleveland: 1994
Detroit: 2005 (Super Bowl)
New York City: 2013 (Super Bowl)
Indianapolis: 2014
Charlotte: 2015
Denver: 2015
Atlanta: 2018 (Super Bowl)
Chicago: 2018
Baltimore: 2019
Boston: 2019
Houston: 2019
Miami: 2019 (Super Bowl)
New Orleans: 2020
Pittsburgh: 2020
Seattle: 2020
Washington: 2020
Dallas: 2021
Green Bay: 2021
Los Angeles: 2021 (Super Bowl)
Nashville: 2021
Buffalo: 2022
Cincinnati: 2022
Jacksonville: 2022
Kansas City: 2022
Minneapolis-St. Paul: 2022
Philadelphia: 2022
Phoenix: 2022 (Super Bowl)
San Francisco: 2022
Tampa: 2022

As you can see, Cleveland has gone longer without hosting an NFL playoff game of any sort than any other city currently with an NFL team. The next longest drought is more than a decade shorter. Clevelanders have suffered long enough. The city needs to be awarded Super Bowl 61 in case the Browns don't get a home playoff game in the next few seasons.

That's not a reason to have them host a Super Bowl. The NFL is in the business of making money, and having Cleveland host the league's biggest game is not likely to be very profitable.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, D82 said:

That's not a reason to have them host a Super Bowl. The NFL is in the business of making money, and having Cleveland host the league's biggest game is not likely to be very profitable.

 

People don't say "money causes more problems than it solves" for no reason. The NFL owes Cleveland this after screwing up the Modell situation nearly 3 decades ago. The Ravens got away with not having to go through an expansion draft, and as a result they have not had consecutive losing seasons since 1996-98. Meanwhile it has been 21 years since the Browns last improved in consecutive seasons, and 34 since their last division title and back-to-back winning let alone playoff seasons; the Browns are the only team not to win a division title in my lifetime. Besides, cold weather football is real football.

Edited by pf9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pf9 said:

People don't say "money causes more problems than it solves" for no reason. The NFL owes Cleveland this after screwing up the Modell situation nearly 3 decades ago. The Ravens got away with not having to go through an expansion draft, and as a result they have not had consecutive losing seasons since 1996-98. Meanwhile it has been 21 years since the Browns last improved in consecutive seasons, and 34 since their last division title and back-to-back winning let alone playoff seasons; the Browns are the only team not to win a division title in my lifetime. Besides, cold weather football is real football.

They don't owe Cleveland anything. 

Cleveland's misfortunes are no one's fault but their own. 

And it's great you think cold weather football is "real football"...but a lot of people don't. And nobody wants to pay thousands of dollars for Super Bowl tickets to go sit in a freezing cold stadium. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, D82 said:

They don't owe Cleveland anything. 

Cleveland's misfortunes are no one's fault but their own. 

And it's great you think cold weather football is "real football"...but a lot of people don't. And nobody wants to pay thousands of dollars for Super Bowl tickets to go sit in a freezing cold stadium. 

As a matter of fact, Paul Tagliabue, the man who orchestrated this plot, doesn't deserve to be in the Pro Football Hall of Fame because of it, especially considering its location in the Cleveland TV market. His poor handling of the Modell situation to me has forever stained his legacy, in spite of all the good things he did do as commissioner. Voting him in was a mistake. I think he should be removed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, D82 said:

And it's great you think cold weather football is "real football"...but a lot of people don't. And nobody wants to pay thousands of dollars for Super Bowl tickets to go sit in a freezing cold stadium. 

People already took a chance on that when MetLife Stadium hosted the Super Bowl, but it proved to be warmer than anticipated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, pf9 said:

People don't say "money causes more problems than it solves" for no reason. The NFL owes Cleveland this after screwing up the Modell situation nearly 3 decades ago. The Ravens got away with not having to go through an expansion draft, and as a result they have not had consecutive losing seasons since 1996-98. Meanwhile it has been 21 years since the Browns last improved in consecutive seasons, and 34 since their last division title and back-to-back winning let alone playoff seasons; the Browns are the only team not to win a division title in my lifetime. Besides, cold weather football is real football.

The city of Cleveland has already accepted a settlement in regards to the Ravens moving to Baltimore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pf9 said:

People already took a chance on that when MetLife Stadium hosted the Super Bowl, but it proved to be warmer than anticipated.

Again, MetLife stadium was a brand new stadium. Why can’t the Browns build a new one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...