Scoundrel Posted September 26 Author Share Posted September 26 12 minutes ago, InjuredReserve said: We need an updated from Scoundrel I’m going to do one with the order I created from last night at so point today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 22 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: So for waiver order wins, division wins and then vote totals and wait for playoffs for head to head? Waivers and playoffs should be the same criteria no? Similarly to draft order and playoff seeding in the NFL I suppose. This week is just a very particular case. If need be I can pick 6th and let Berlin/Rome pick 4th and 5th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 26 Author Share Posted September 26 13 minutes ago, TedLavie said: Waivers and playoffs should be the same criteria no? Similarly to draft order and playoff seeding in the NFL I suppose. This week is just a very particular case. If need be I can pick 6th and let Berlin/Rome pick 4th and 5th. Yes but no one is helping me figure it out and I’ve said multiple times I’m confused. Help me figure out where Las Vegas should go also? They beat NOLA but have less votes for than I do or IC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Just now, Scoundrel said: Yes but no one is helping me figure it out and I’ve said multiple times I’m confused I don't think there's an answer to your question. I'm assuming NFL settles those with like a coin toss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InjuredReserve Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 1 minute ago, Scoundrel said: Yes but no one is helping me figure it out and I’ve said multiple times I’m confused. Help me figure out where Las Vegas should go also? They beat NOLA but have less votes for than I do or IC My ranking with Nola right now does confuse me. I assumed +/- would decide. But we are evenly split. So wouldn't it be then who won against each other? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 26 Author Share Posted September 26 Just now, InjuredReserve said: My ranking with Nola right now does confuse me. I assumed +/- would decide. But we are evenly split. So wouldn't it be then who won against each other? I think so… I don’t think it should have you jump me and IC. But the Quebec one is more complicated… because Berlin has the best vote total but lost head to head to Rome who has a worse vote total than Quebec… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 26 Author Share Posted September 26 8 hours ago, Scoundrel said: 1.1 Greenland 0-3 (-42) (DV0) 1.2 Raleigh 0-3 (-27) (DV0) 1.3 Cwmfelinfach 1-2 (-13) (DV0) 1.4 Berlin 1-2 (-8) (DV1) 1.5 Rome 1-2 (-13) (DV1) 1.6 Quebec 1-2 (-12) (DV1) 1.7 Akureyri 1-2 (-7) (DV1) 1.8 Lancaster 1-2 (0) (DV1) 1.9 Hungary 2-1 (3) (DV1) 1.10 New Orleans 2-1 (11) (DV1) 1.11 Las Vegas 2-1 (11) (DV1) 1.12 Ivory Coast 2-1 (14) (DV1) 1.13 Anchorage 2-1 (19) (DV1) 1.14 Cuba 2-1 (13) (DV2) 1.15 Cancun 3-0 (17) (DV2) 1.16 Svalbard 3-0 (26) (DV2) A bit unsure on the Quebec, Berlin, Rome placement Rome beat Berlin, Berlin has a better vote differential than Quebec, Rome has a worse vote differential than Quebec… Also is Las Vegas a higher seed than those of us with higher vote totals since they beat Cuba head to head but Cuba has 2 division wins so they should have A higher seed than the other 2-1 teams outside of Vegas. Maybe I shouldn’t do the order anymore… @TedLavie @InjuredReserve I think this is it tbh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InjuredReserve Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 5 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: @TedLavie @InjuredReserve I think this is it tbh This is what I would assume would be right. The others made less sense to me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuskieTitan Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 ICBR is looking to move any player not locked down for future draft picks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 26 Author Share Posted September 26 Mock it to me baby 1.1 Greenland- Travis Hunter Everything Colorado I would go Will Johnson here personally but I think with Greenland already taking Caleb and JJ it definitely isn’t a QB and Hunter provides the most versatile star power in the draft and Greenland rolls the dice on the fun 1.2 Raleigh- Will Johnson CB Michigan This team could desperately use a top notch corner prospect who can matchup with opposing teams number ones. They took Penix and likely go the shark tank route. They could roll with QB here but the Young experience has them a bit jaded so they go with the stud at corner. 1.3 Cwmfelinfach- Mason Graham INT Michigan They would have liked to grab Johnson or Hunter and with taking Daniels and Maye last year they won’t go QB. They have two studs at DT in Jones and Wilkins but how about a little 3-4 front fun with Wilkins playing a penetrating NT type with Jones and Graham at end. What an opposing potential dominating front with Jones also having the ability to kick out to jumbo end. The versatility this pick provides is exciting. 1.4 Quebec- Cam Ward QB Miami Quebec is going to need a talented signal caller as Tua can’t stay healthy. Others likely have Ewers, Sanders, or Beck higher but I think the potential with Ward is top notch. 1.5 Berlin- James Pearce Jr Edge Tennessee Pearce hasn’t been as productive this year but he still has big time potential. Rags gets his guy here at 5 to hopefully for Berlin provide a dynamic duo with Bosa to terrorize opposing QBs. 1.6 Rome- Tetairoa McMillan WR Arizona Rome has Cooper and Waddle as FA after this year. They may 3up both but a talented big receiver who can separate like McMillan is a plus asset. Plus it is funny to have BCb try and spell the name. Probably will just call him TMaC. 1.7 Hungary (from Akureyri)- Kelvin Banks Jr OT Texas Hungary adds a top OT prospect here to protect their QB investments. He can play RT for them or cover for Tyron at LT when he inevitably gets injured. 1.8 Anchorage (from Lancaster)- Nic Scourton Edge Texas A&M Scourton is a big rusher who can get after it and set a strong edge. I have zero depth at the position after this year and he would really give me a nice rotational piece off the edge. 1.9 New Orleans- Will Campbell OT LSU They really like the tank oline building but the chance to grab a possible cornerstone LT here wins out. Cost controlled for years is the decision here to protect Josh Allen. 1.10 Ivory Coast- Malaki Starks S UGA Ruskie puts the PTSD of a Cine selection in the back of his mind and takes the well rounded Starks here. He can cover, run support, and just do it all. A rare safety prospect worthy of a top 10 pick. 1.11 Berlin (from Hungary)- Deone Walker INT Kentucky Berlin grabs a large man who can get after the QB. Mazi looks like a failed experiment and Brown is coming off an ACL. Keeping that rotation beastly after also adding Pearce and Berlin Dline is an even scarier unit than it already was. 1.12 Anchorage- Quinn Ewers QB Texas If I want to get back to having multiple firsts I need to find assets I can trade for bigger gains later. I really like Ewers skillset and this just might be the opportunity to capitalize on adding a young QB. 1.13 Lancaster (from Cuba)- Benjamin Morrison CB ND Mike and Rack can argue over if this should be Burden or a corner. Ultimately they decide corner is the direction to go and add a talented cover man to their secondary. 1.14 Las Vegas- Luther Burden lll WR Mizzou Vegas adds a very talented WR prospect who reminds me a lot of DJ Moore. Versatile can play inside our outside and a nice addition to their offense. 1.15 Las Vegas (from Cancun)- Tacario Davis CB Arizona BB is sad Vegas fails to add beef in round 1 but how about a 6’4 listed corner. We all know how much IR loved Juju Brents so he gets someone to fill his long corner fetish here. 1.16 Berlin (from Svalbard)- Emery Jones OT LSU Jones is a RT who can allow Wirfs to play the LT and let Kolton Miller walk with his hefty contract as Berlin looks to pay other friends more money. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Wow, I was eyeing McDonald and figured he was out of my price range but didn't think Ruskie could get a first for him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 I have no idea who any of the specific players in this picture are but I found it incredibly funny 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 That would be a fun argument. I do like Burden. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 33 minutes ago, Blue said: Wow, I was eyeing McDonald and figured he was out of my price range but didn't think Ruskie could get a first for him. The draft is all an illusion. Welcome to the Mines! WMD 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-news-roundup-latest-league-updates-from-thursday-sept-26 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.