SirA1 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 (edited) 3 minutes ago, TedLavie said: I think we would need a two step process. 1. Agree with the change for 2026 and onwards? (Majority rule) / 2. If voted, impact on 2025? (Unanimous ruling required) Lol. Might as well not even post it then. @EaglesPeteC has already said he would play the Tommy Tuberville role. Edited January 3 by SirA1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 @TedLavie also is this going to be a yearly increase or a one time increase that we can then revisit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Just now, Scoundrel said: @TedLavie also is this going to be a yearly increase or a one time increase that we can then revisit? Yearly. I'm editing my original proposal to make it clearer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 Just now, TedLavie said: Yearly. I'm editing my original proposal to make it clearer Okay thanks. Let me know when it’s finished and I’ll post it up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 1 minute ago, TedLavie said: Yearly. I'm editing my original proposal to make it clearer As someone who doesn't like drafting now I would hate it even more. This is a deal killer for me because then we will be a year behind on Cap Space and current with ever increasing Rookie Contracts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 6 minutes ago, SirA1 said: As someone who doesn't like drafting now I would hate it even more. This is a deal killer for me because then we will be a year behind on Cap Space and current with ever increasing Rookie Contracts. It would also grow the number further away in rounds 1-5 each year from 6-PFA making your possible proposal of a round 7 PFA even more logical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 So Ted under your scale pick 6.09 no longer becomes sub 500 cut able in 2027 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 4 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: It would also grow the number further away in rounds 1-5 each year from 6-PFA making your possible proposal of a round 7 PFA even more logical. Yeah every five years should be fine for a scale increase. I don't do things like TCMD because of the headache of dealing with the RL Salary Cap stuff. This seems like a move in that direction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 13 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: Okay thanks. Let me know when it’s finished and I’ll post it up Done 8 minutes ago, SirA1 said: As someone who doesn't like drafting now I would hate it even more. This is a deal killer for me because then we will be a year behind on Cap Space and current with ever increasing Rookie Contracts. Why? The increase would be linked to the increase in the BDL cap space, not the IRL one. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 Just now, TedLavie said: Done Why? The increase would be linked to the increase in the BDL cap space, not the IRL one. Check if I captured it correctly in the proposal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 2 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: So Ted under your scale pick 6.09 no longer becomes sub 500 cut able in 2027 That's because I'm dumb. Fixed now 🙂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedGold Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 It is likely there for a reason. But I would propose PFA’s start as 3 year deals after drafted similar to 5th-7th rounders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 2 minutes ago, RedGold said: It is likely there for a reason. But I would propose PFA’s start as 3 year deals after drafted similar to 5th-7th rounders. Added Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 7 minutes ago, SirA1 said: Yeah every five years should be fine for a scale increase. I don't do things like TCMD because of the headache of dealing with the RL Salary Cap stuff. This seems like a move in that direction. It's just a way to avoid having to go long periods when the scale is totally outdated. I'm open to discuss the yearly increase, but it just seems like an easy arbitrary rule to avoid having to deal with this stuff every once in a while tbh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Not really a proposal, but we need to decide whether the Bizz Bowl week happens in W16 or in W17 IRL to avoid the confusion of this year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.