DaBoys Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 1 hour ago, TVScout said: It doesn't matter how good a player is if he can't stay on the field. Except I don’t think he’s ever missed a playoff game, and he was healthy enough last year to start 13 games. He was the best OT in the game when he was in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBoys Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 2 hours ago, MaddHatter said: F it - you’re right - let’s draft Spencer Rattler and send Dak off for a first and 3rd so we can suck for the next 5years. While we’re at it, let’s trade DLaw, Micah, Lamb, Diggs, Bland and Tyler. We clearly don’t need them and their high cost contracts. Then let’s trade all our picks this year for future picks and load up on firsts and seconds for 2027 I don’t think all of their cap hits combined equal Daks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaddHatter Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 10 minutes ago, DaBoys said: I don’t think all of their cap hits combined equal Daks. Zack, Lamb and DLaw surpass his and the final year is always the most. If we extend he’s likely back down to 40m Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plan9misfit Posted March 8 Share Posted March 8 Reports are surfacing that we are NOT going to extend Dak and are going to let him play out his contract, absorbing the $59.5M hit this season. If true, this is huge and the absolutely right thing to do. It gets us out from under his thumb and he no longer has contract leverage. Taking it in the shorts for one season is a much smarter move than locking ourselves up for more financial hell and playoff failures for the next 5-6 years. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBoys Posted March 8 Share Posted March 8 3 hours ago, plan9misfit said: Reports are surfacing that we are NOT going to extend Dak and are going to let him play out his contract, absorbing the $59.5M hit this season. If true, this is huge and the absolutely right thing to do. It gets us out from under his thumb and he no longer has contract leverage. Taking it in the shorts for one season is a much smarter move than locking ourselves up for more financial hell and playoff failures for the next 5-6 years. I’m not getting my hopes all worked up. But that is a great thing to read. That would also open the door to him possibly waiving his no trade clause for someone who would want to extend him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WizardHawk Posted March 8 Share Posted March 8 3 hours ago, plan9misfit said: Reports are surfacing that we are NOT going to extend Dak and are going to let him play out his contract, absorbing the $59.5M hit this season. If true, this is huge and the absolutely right thing to do. It gets us out from under his thumb and he no longer has contract leverage. Taking it in the shorts for one season is a much smarter move than locking ourselves up for more financial hell and playoff failures for the next 5-6 years. I’d confidently bet a 3 month salary this isn’t happening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheStarStillShines Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Dak has sued a woman and her attorneys for extortion, as they've claimed he sexually assaulted her in 2017. The woman is seeking $100M in damages. The article claims that the woman's attorneys sent a letter to Dak's representatives seeking compensation in exchange for not making the charges public. While we don't know all the details, the woman's claim does sound questionable. https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/39711522/prescott-response-assault-claims-accuses-woman-plot-extort-100m 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaddHatter Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 (edited) I figured Dak’s 60m was #1, but loandbehold it’s not. Thanks Cleveland haha. Also Cards and Giants paying $50m each for a bottom 15 QB is hillarious. Things could be worse I guess Edited March 13 by MaddHatter 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plan9misfit Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 On 3/11/2024 at 7:11 PM, TheStarStillShines said: Dak has sued a woman and her attorneys for extortion, as they've claimed he sexually assaulted her in 2017. The woman is seeking $100M in damages. The article claims that the woman's attorneys sent a letter to Dak's representatives seeking compensation in exchange for not making the charges public. While we don't know all the details, the woman's claim does sound questionable. https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/39711522/prescott-response-assault-claims-accuses-woman-plot-extort-100m That sounds incredibly suspicious. They wanted a payoff to keep quiet? Sounds a bit like extortion, if you ask me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plan9misfit Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 (edited) 59 minutes ago, MaddHatter said: I figured Dak’s 60m was #1, but loandbehold it’s not. Thanks Cleveland haha. Also Cards and Giants paying $50m each for a bottom 15 QB is hillarious. Things could be worse I guess And, the Chargers need to either restructure some of those guys or release them within the next 2 hours to get under the cap. Edited March 13 by plan9misfit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaddHatter Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 3 minutes ago, plan9misfit said: And, the Chargers need to either restructure some of those guys or release them within the next 2 hours to get under the cap. Yup - train wreck for them - not sure how you wait this long but they’re doing their best to screw crap up Spanos style 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaddHatter Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 And they just released Mike Williams Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
textaz03 Posted March 13 Author Share Posted March 13 30 minutes ago, MaddHatter said: And they just released Mike Williams And now this too Chargers & DE Khalil Mack Agree To Restructured Contract nfltraderumors.co/chargers-de-kh… #Chargers https://x.com/nfltrade_rumors/status/1767982917001904381?s=46&t=ktd6JTByZwOAf6VhdnN4wg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
textaz03 Posted March 13 Author Share Posted March 13 Regardless of anything else, as of 45 minutes from now when the new League year starts, there is no longer any rush to sign Dak to a new extension because we don’t need any big free agency money to sign anybody as they area all ready taken. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PincheJimmy Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 On 3/8/2024 at 11:09 AM, plan9misfit said: Reports are surfacing that we are NOT going to extend Dak and are going to let him play out his contract, absorbing the $59.5M hit this season. If true, this is huge and the absolutely right thing to do. It gets us out from under his thumb and he no longer has contract leverage. Taking it in the shorts for one season is a much smarter move than locking ourselves up for more financial hell and playoff failures for the next 5-6 years. And probably why they didn’t pursue any free agents ( not that they do anyway most of the time ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.