Jump to content

Potential Aiyuk Trade Talk


Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, warfelg said:

The way Dan Graziano talked about it on NFL Live makes it sound like the Niners told Aiyuk to “go find a deal” because they didn’t think anyone was going to offer him that much.

It worked for the Ravens 🙂

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a rumor that our offer is 2025 2nd and 2026 5th, and if we came up to a 3rd in 2026 it would be done. Instead each time that BA is looking to walk SF asks for a little more time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am so done with this. I can do nothing, but make jokes now. 😁

In the immortal words of TLC and Mars Blackmon, "I ain't too proud to beg!" 😁

MV5BMzU1NjkxMTctYWI5MC00NjA0LThiNzAtM2Jk

Please Ayuik, Please baby, baby, please!!!!!!

giphy.gif

Come on over to the Black N Gold side Brandon.....

giphy.gif

Why don't you make up your mind!!!!!

Frank-Zappa-Them-or-Us-1.jpg?fit=480%2C360&ssl=1

I'm just so confused. 

aiyuk-steelers-.webp

I'm not!!!

Omar-Khan.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be ok with 3rd in 26' . Just get it over with and solidify WR , keep GP  and then fix other areas o f the roster

agree?

@Steeler Hitman, just relax,  remember to breathe and this will  one day be completed.  No need to get too anxious  regarding  a usual .529 team ;)

Edited by 3rivers
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, warfelg said:

There's a rumor that our offer is 2025 2nd and 2026 5th, and if we came up to a 3rd in 2026 it would be done. Instead each time that BA is looking to walk SF asks for a little more time.

If it's just a matter of sending a 2025 2nd and a 2026 3rd, I would say go for it. If the 49ers are moving the goalposts in negotiation as you mention, then I can definitely see the stance of standing pat almost out of principle.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, skywlker32 said:

If it's just a matter of sending a 2025 2nd and a 2026 3rd, I would say go for it. If the 49ers are moving the goalposts in negotiation as you mention, then I can definitely see the stance of standing pat almost out of principle.

but if this is how they last moved the goalpost  , the 3rd is fair isn't it?    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 3rivers said:

but if this is how they last moved the goalpost  , the 3rd is fair isn't it?    

It is. I'm more talking about moving goalposts in the form of:

SF-We want a 1st round pick

PIT-We can do a 2nd and a 5th

SF-2nd and 3rd?

PIT-Fine

SF-We want 2 2nds now

This doesn't seem far off from what they have been doing from the sounds of it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 3rivers said:

I would be ok with 3rd in 26' . Just get it over with and solidify WR , keep GP  and then fix other areas o f the roster

agree?

@Steeler Hitman, just relax,  remember to breathe and this will  one day be completed.  No need to get too anxious  regarding  a usual .529 team ;)

I'm fine. I just don't have the patience for all the drama. I have learned to tune it out. It happens when it happens. I am more upset with the same reporting of "nothing new," stated like it is something new. 
You have until X day and time. After that, I am pulling my offer. horse-head-in-bed.jpg?fit=1642,678&ssl=1

 

I could be wrong because I don't know what to believe, but this is why I believe no players were mentioned in the trade. That would be hell on someone on the field being in limbo, trying to practice, and be dedicated to your team.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, skywlker32 said:

It is. I'm more talking about moving goalposts in the form of:

SF-We want a 1st round pick

PIT-We can do a 2nd and a 5th

SF-2nd and 3rd?

PIT-Fine

SF-We want 2 2nds now

This doesn't seem far off from what they have been doing from the sounds of it.

robert-de-niro-as-al-capone-baseball.jpg

You guys aren't being team players. You need a little enthusiasm (pronounced In Toos E Asim)!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, skywlker32 said:

It is. I'm more talking about moving goalposts in the form of:

SF-We want a 1st round pick

PIT-We can do a 2nd and a 5th

SF-2nd and 3rd?

PIT-Fine

SF-We want 2 2nds now

This doesn't seem far off from what they have been doing from the sounds of it.

It's more, from what I understand, going:

SF - We want 2 1sts, or 2nd and Pickens, or 2nd 5th and Muth

Pit - No, 2nd and 5th, BTW Aiyuk we have this contract for you

Aiyuk - I like what Pitt has

SF - BA, give us a day

BA - Ok

SF - Here's $28MM AAV

Pit - Well?

BA- I like what pitt has

SF - Give us a day

SF - Here's a new Contract

BA - I like what Pitt has

SF - Pitt, wanna offer us more?

Pitt - No

SF - BA, give us a day...

And on and on.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...