spilltray Posted March 1, 2018 Share Posted March 1, 2018 8 hours ago, JustAnotherFan said: People are still wanting to use stats to compare players from different eras and don't fully understand just how much the game has changed..... I don't even know what to say about it anymore. It hasn't fundamentally changed enough to justify more than double the INT rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtait93 Posted March 1, 2018 Share Posted March 1, 2018 9 hours ago, JustAnotherFan said: People are still wanting to use stats to compare players from different eras and don't fully understand just how much the game has changed..... I don't even know what to say about it anymore. Throwing nearly 100 less interceptions in both of their first 10 years as starters speaks for itself. Idc what era your in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blazer026 Posted March 1, 2018 Share Posted March 1, 2018 I think Rodgers is probably the better QB. Farve played when you could tee-off on the QB though, I don't know if Rodgers could take those hits. Both healthy though, I'd take Rodgers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted March 1, 2018 Share Posted March 1, 2018 Rodgers by a mile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketchup Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 3 hours ago, Blazer026 said: I think Rodgers is probably the better QB. Farve played when you could tee-off on the QB though, I don't know if Rodgers could take those hits. Both healthy though, I'd take Rodgers. Favre also stupidly played through injuries and concussions that he wouldn’t have been allowed to in today’s NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malik Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 9 hours ago, spilltray said: It hasn't fundamentally changed enough to justify more than double the INT rate. Right. It's because he was gunslinger. Marino who played earlier has virtually an identically statline across the first 10 years. He had 3 more touchdowns, 875 more yards) and 5 less interceptions (he also played in 10 less games). There's no shame in coming second to Aaron Rodgers though. Favre still comes ahead of other Hall of Fame QBs that crossed his era like Jim Kelly, Warren Moon, and John Elway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikes635 Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 Aaron Rodgers and it's not even close!! I would take Bart Starr over Farve. Farve= most overrated QB in the history of the NFL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.