MD4L Posted December 16, 2018 Share Posted December 16, 2018 4 minutes ago, Jlash said: He'll be a great bench player for them next year. Cook/Samuels might be a thing next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted December 16, 2018 Author Share Posted December 16, 2018 1 minute ago, MD4L said: Cook/Samuels might be a thing next year. Not if Samuels is sitting the bench behind Conner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Jlash said: Not if Samuels is sitting the bench behind Conner. Samuels is working well in the lead role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted December 17, 2018 Author Share Posted December 17, 2018 Goff sucks real hard in crunch time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted December 17, 2018 Author Share Posted December 17, 2018 Goff'd it so bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Gotta say I'm impressed with the game plans I'm reading. You guys go all out some are a bit longer than I'd like but completely understandable. Having a lot of fun with it. Crazy how quiet it gets in here on the weekends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey5djh Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 (edited) I'm not sure who maintains the "things we need to vote on next year" but I would like to propose a format change for weekly submissions Edited December 17, 2018 by Hockey5djh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 50 minutes ago, Hockey5djh said: I'm not sure who maintains the "things we need to vote on next year" but I would like to propose a format change for weekly submissions I got no say in anything but what you thinking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 34 minutes ago, ny92mike said: I got no say in anything but what you thinking? your an owner, you have a vote just like everyone else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey5djh Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 2 hours ago, ny92mike said: I got no say in anything but what you thinking? 1 hour ago, bcb1213 said: your an owner, you have a vote just like everyone else Unfortunately nothing to do with your forms, at least not initially. I've been mulling over the idea of a "limited rebuttal" something like a 300 character limit to counter what your opponent has game planned and/or call out any inconsistencies. I hate when match-ups turn into pissing contests in the thread but I think there is some value in it as even NFL coaches have halftime to re-assess what was done in the first half and make adjustments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 2 hours ago, Hockey5djh said: I'm not sure who maintains the "things we need to vote on next year" but I would like to propose a format change for weekly submissions I'd like to hear more, but I will say that I will likely be opposed to anything that pigeon-holes our ability to write a game plan. This year was supposed to be a throw away year for me. I was expecting to finish where people expected me to finish. However, I put together one hell (IMO of course) of a gameplan that blew out one of the league's super powers. This one gameplan changed the entire trajectory of my season and, consequently, the trajectory of this league's season. Without this win, I don't trade for Rodney Hudson, I don't trade for Melvin Gordon, and I am stuck in the rebuilding era like many of our non-playoff teams. I like sitting down and writing a gameplan. I know it gets tedious for many throughout the season, me included, but reducing our freedom to put together a truly custom gameplan would be a detriment to this league. It's the only form of "Any Given Sunday" we've got outside of random major injuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Hockey5djh said: Unfortunately nothing to do with your forms, at least not initially. I've been mulling over the idea of a "limited rebuttal" something like a 300 character limit to counter what your opponent has game planned and/or call out any inconsistencies. I hate when match-ups turn into pissing contests in the thread but I think there is some value in it as even NFL coaches have halftime to re-assess what was done in the first half and make adjustments. This might have some value. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey5djh Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, Whicker said: I'd like to hear more, but I will say that I will likely be opposed to anything that pigeon-holes our ability to write a game plan. Just now, Whicker said: I like sitting down and writing a gameplan. I know it gets tedious for many throughout the season, me included, but reducing our freedom to put together a truly custom gameplan would be a detriment to this league. It's the only form of "Any Given Sunday" we've got outside of random major injuries. Nah, I don't want to limit the gameplans as I like that each person has a different spin and different approach. I do want to have an "official rebuttal" to limit in thread player pimping and back and forths between owners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey5djh Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, Whicker said: This might have some value. Thanks. Its just an initial idea and something that can be tinkered with but I do want to bring it up for discussion at the owners meeting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 2 hours ago, Hockey5djh said: Unfortunately nothing to do with your forms, at least not initially. I've been mulling over the idea of a "limited rebuttal" something like a 300 character limit to counter what your opponent has game planned and/or call out any inconsistencies. I hate when match-ups turn into pissing contests in the thread but I think there is some value in it as even NFL coaches have halftime to re-assess what was done in the first half and make adjustments. I had a response typed out for the "300 character limit" rip that minute of my life. then I realized you meant in the comments section. Can we implement the 300 character limit on just Dingo though? might force him to be creative with them for once. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts