Jump to content

Stock Up, Stock Down Weeks 1&2


ChaRisMa

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, incognito_man said:

Such nonsense...

The strongest praise HHCD gets around here is that he is "average" or maaaaybe "a little above average". And here you are, throwing around hyperbole like "an abomination" and crying that those who disagree with you "think every player is an All-Pro".

This is the absolute worst kind of nonsense on these boards. The kind where, to defend one's own overly-dramatic opinion, you COMPLETELY INVENT a dramatic opinion on the other end of the spectrum.

It's so annoying.

Just stop.

I'm telling ya...the ignore button works like magic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Joe said:

Maybe I'm opening a can of worms here, but couldn't those stats be an indictment on our front-7? In another thread, some were debating that Daniels and CMIII appeared to have down years or weren't playing as well as they had in previous years. Personally, I'm starting to sour a bit on Mo Wilkerson; not sure he's really bringing the heat we expected him to bring, though he could be doing a lot of little things that don't show up in the box score in which we are completely unaware.

 

On the other hand, we're going into Week 3 of a new defensive scheme with a lot of new pieces...

It depends on what expectations you set for yourself. Sure, it would be nice is he was 2012-15 Wilk, but we're not paying him like he's 2012-15 Wilk either. Doesn't mean he's not filling a quality role. DL are not going to fill up a box score. I don't see any issues with Daniels either. If there are issues in the front-7, it's on the edge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2018 at 4:57 PM, Cheech said:

Effort certainly is.  

HaHa takes being the last line of defense VERY seriously.  He's not doing to lay a hand on anyone unless he absolutely has to.  

That's what I see too .. just looks like he dogs it a lot, and isn't very interested in hitting anyone.  To me at least he plays like a guy that doesn't want to even think about taking a chance at getting hurt because he's close to a major payday.  Maybe it's something where once he gets paid he will bring the lumber, but I've soured on him to the point that I wouldn't want to give him the big contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/20/2018 at 5:16 PM, TransientTexan said:

It depends on what expectations you set for yourself. Sure, it would be nice is he was 2012-15 Wilk, but we're not paying him like he's 2012-15 Wilk either. Doesn't mean he's not filling a quality role. DL are not going to fill up a box score. I don't see any issues with Daniels either. If there are issues in the front-7, it's on the edge. 

This /\

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...