Jump to content
WizardHawk

DAY 3 DISCUSSION -

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Tony7188 said:

Isaiah Johnson was who I was hoping for too. So frustrating. But Pollard was desperately needed over a tall, fast, rangy cover corner. 

I can't understand how this front office can be constantly incompetent like this every year without significant changes. 

Dude...we’re one of the better drafting teams in the league, c’mon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CAPJ said:

Still havent addressed oline need.

Oakland and Buffalo had strong drafts.

LOL. I have hated Oakland Draft.

Buffalo drafted much like Dallas would have drafted. Love their draft as well.

Agreed on Arizona and OL. But roam wasn't built in a day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What an odd run on RBs. If Dallas liked Pollard - I get why the felt they needed to take him - but the sheer amount of RBs in the 4th, especially when I don't think they are all that good, is odd to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really think Pallard also helps out on offense. A RB that is really good catching out of the Backfield. This is what we've been asking for. To change our Vanilla Offense. He ran a 4.37 and would spead out a defense. Would I rather have picked Johnson IDK, but with Jones, Awuzie, Brown, and Lewis Johnson may not see the field. Pallard can be used in many ways 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Texas_OutLaw7 said:

What an odd run on RBs. If Dallas liked Pollard - I get why the felt they needed to take him - but the sheer amount of RBs in the 4th, especially when I don't think they are all that good, is odd to me.

He’s a Moore pick. Have to think he’s going to factor into the offense this year and not just on ST.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, D82 said:

He’s a Moore pick. Have to think he’s going to factor into the offense this year and not just on ST.

Sure - just saying the entire NFL is drafting RBs early this round. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have preferred Anderson but maybe his leg is worse then I thought. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Texas_OutLaw7 said:

What an odd run on RBs. If Dallas liked Pollard - I get why the felt they needed to take him - but the sheer amount of RBs in the 4th, especially when I don't think they are all that good, is odd to me.

Can't argue this. Lot of RBs left on the board who I believe offer the same as Pollard. That knack for the big play though, especially in return game is hard to overlook. Dallas hasn't had anyone in some time with that kind of ability.  Not in love with the pick by any means, but don't hate it either. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, WizardHawk said:

Can't argue this. Lot of RBs left on the board who I believe offer the same as Pollard. That knack for the big play though, especially in return game is hard to overlook. Dallas hasn't had anyone in some time with that kind of ability.  Not in love with the pick by any means, but don't hate it either. 

We had Switzer who we traded to Oakland for someone that got cut rather quickly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Texas_OutLaw7 said:

What an odd run on RBs. If Dallas liked Pollard - I get why the felt they needed to take him - but the sheer amount of RBs in the 4th, especially when I don't think they are all that good, is odd to me.

I don’t like RB to be the pick, but if they are taking one, I like a guy like Pollard if Moore will actually use him. Some of the other names were basically Zeke backups. Pollard can actually have some worthwhile packages, and might be really effective in the jet sweep role. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CAPJ said:

We had Switzer who we traded to Oakland for someone that got cut rather quickly.

Pollard is better

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, CAPJ said:

We had Switzer who we traded to Oakland for someone that got cut rather quickly.

Oakland didn't want Switz either. Believe Pollard offers more too. 

Edited by WizardHawk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×