D82 Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tony7188 said: Isaiah Johnson was who I was hoping for too. So frustrating. But Pollard was desperately needed over a tall, fast, rangy cover corner. I can't understand how this front office can be constantly incompetent like this every year without significant changes. Dude...we’re one of the better drafting teams in the league, c’mon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 Just now, CAPJ said: Still havent addressed oline need. Oakland and Buffalo had strong drafts. LOL. I have hated Oakland Draft. Buffalo drafted much like Dallas would have drafted. Love their draft as well. Agreed on Arizona and OL. But roam wasn't built in a day. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TVScout Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 1 hour ago, Texas_OutLaw7 said: roam ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 What an odd run on RBs. If Dallas liked Pollard - I get why the felt they needed to take him - but the sheer amount of RBs in the 4th, especially when I don't think they are all that good, is odd to me. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 1 minute ago, TVScout said: ? Apparently I can't spell Rome today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagles suck Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 I really think Pallard also helps out on offense. A RB that is really good catching out of the Backfield. This is what we've been asking for. To change our Vanilla Offense. He ran a 4.37 and would spead out a defense. Would I rather have picked Johnson IDK, but with Jones, Awuzie, Brown, and Lewis Johnson may not see the field. Pallard can be used in many ways Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D82 Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 Just now, Texas_OutLaw7 said: What an odd run on RBs. If Dallas liked Pollard - I get why the felt they needed to take him - but the sheer amount of RBs in the 4th, especially when I don't think they are all that good, is odd to me. He’s a Moore pick. Have to think he’s going to factor into the offense this year and not just on ST. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 Just now, D82 said: He’s a Moore pick. Have to think he’s going to factor into the offense this year and not just on ST. Sure - just saying the entire NFL is drafting RBs early this round. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calvert28 Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 I would have preferred Anderson but maybe his leg is worse then I thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WizardHawk Posted April 27, 2019 Author Share Posted April 27, 2019 2 minutes ago, Texas_OutLaw7 said: What an odd run on RBs. If Dallas liked Pollard - I get why the felt they needed to take him - but the sheer amount of RBs in the 4th, especially when I don't think they are all that good, is odd to me. Can't argue this. Lot of RBs left on the board who I believe offer the same as Pollard. That knack for the big play though, especially in return game is hard to overlook. Dallas hasn't had anyone in some time with that kind of ability. Not in love with the pick by any means, but don't hate it either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPJ Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 1 minute ago, WizardHawk said: Can't argue this. Lot of RBs left on the board who I believe offer the same as Pollard. That knack for the big play though, especially in return game is hard to overlook. Dallas hasn't had anyone in some time with that kind of ability. Not in love with the pick by any means, but don't hate it either. We had Switzer who we traded to Oakland for someone that got cut rather quickly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nextyearfordaboyz Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 4 minutes ago, Texas_OutLaw7 said: What an odd run on RBs. If Dallas liked Pollard - I get why the felt they needed to take him - but the sheer amount of RBs in the 4th, especially when I don't think they are all that good, is odd to me. I don’t like RB to be the pick, but if they are taking one, I like a guy like Pollard if Moore will actually use him. Some of the other names were basically Zeke backups. Pollard can actually have some worthwhile packages, and might be really effective in the jet sweep role. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D82 Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 1 minute ago, CAPJ said: We had Switzer who we traded to Oakland for someone that got cut rather quickly. Pollard is better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WizardHawk Posted April 27, 2019 Author Share Posted April 27, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, CAPJ said: We had Switzer who we traded to Oakland for someone that got cut rather quickly. Oakland didn't want Switz either. Believe Pollard offers more too. Edited April 27, 2019 by WizardHawk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.