dtait93 Posted November 28, 2019 Author Share Posted November 28, 2019 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragevsuall17 Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deeluxx3 Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 1 hour ago, ragevsuall17 said: Another great Baldy breakdown sidebar, but he’s a really really really great analyst and does his homework on all players. Just name dropping Blasingame as if he’s a vet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanTuff Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 "The King is loose... This Tennessee Titans team? Looking strong. Like playoff strong." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtait93 Posted December 3, 2019 Author Share Posted December 3, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanTuff Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 LOLOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Hope- Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 17 minutes ago, TitanTuff said: LOLOL lmao. i believe that is auburn alum daren bates with the speaker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTitan Posted December 8, 2019 Share Posted December 8, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtait93 Posted December 8, 2019 Author Share Posted December 8, 2019 1 hour ago, KingTitan said: Get it done jrob! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragevsuall17 Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 Just a quick thought... With Gordon being a FA after this year and Leveon Bell being talked about potentially being cut... Would either of them be better signings than Henry, if money was the same? Henry may be the better pure runner, but both those guys are better all around/3 down backs... Just something that came to mind last night... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanRedd Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 46 minutes ago, ragevsuall17 said: Just a quick thought... With Gordon being a FA after this year and Leveon Bell being talked about potentially being cut... Would either of them be better signings than Henry, if money was the same? Henry may be the better pure runner, but both those guys are better all around/3 down backs... Just something that came to mind last night... Gordon I’m scared of only has played 1 healthy full season. Leveon no doubt is better as an all around back but if I’m TN I find away to get it done 4yr 50 mill some like 12 mill annually Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragevsuall17 Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 On 12/15/2019 at 10:07 AM, TitanRedd said: Gordon I’m scared of only has played 1 healthy full season. Leveon no doubt is better as an all around back but if I’m TN I find away to get it done 4yr 50 mill some like 12 mill annually Again... the total numbers don't concern me much. What's it look like after 2 years... which has become the standard NFL contract. All guarantees in the first 2 years, making all years after a year to year thing. Bell's contract, which I'm assuming you're using as a baseline (4 years, 52M)... has it at 2 years/28M... I would want something less than that for Henry... say 2 years 22M. The 28M can be on the backend, meaning minimal penalties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanRedd Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 18 minutes ago, ragevsuall17 said: Again... the total numbers don't concern me much. What's it look like after 2 years... which has become the standard NFL contract. All guarantees in the first 2 years, making all years after a year to year thing. Bell's contract, which I'm assuming you're using as a baseline (4 years, 52M)... has it at 2 years/28M... I would want something less than that for Henry... say 2 years 22M. The 28M can be on the backend, meaning minimal penalties. With a RB I rather get his guaranteed money out the way up front therefore when he falls off when can easily get out of it. But I’m pretty sure it’s gone take close 35 mill guaranteed to get Henry under contract. For the simple fact RB’s get 1-2 big deals, 2 if they were a high 1st round pick. Henry is looking to cash in because this may be his only big deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragevsuall17 Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 19 minutes ago, TitanRedd said: With a RB I rather get his guaranteed money out the way up front therefore when he falls off when can easily get out of it. But I’m pretty sure it’s gone take close 35 mill guaranteed to get Henry under contract. For the simple fact RB’s get 1-2 big deals, 2 if they were a high 1st round pick. Henry is looking to cash in because this may be his only big deal. Not just RBs... all contracts are being structured that way... its the standard for the most part (Kirk Cousins contract aside). Put all the guaranteed money in the first 2 years, and make it year to year after that. The only penalties teams would carry are any amounts of the SB that were prorated... they don't need to pay out anymore, but it has to count against the cap. 35M G for Henry when Bell got 28M last year... I wouldn't do it. I'm looking more at 22M, although 24M would be ok. Henry to me is not on the same level of the Bells and Gurleys and Barkleys as true 3 down backs. And while Henry's been durable in his career... will he be able to hold up for 2 years if we keep using him the way we have (you're looking at close to 400 carries the past 17 games, including last year's stretch to close the year). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanRedd Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 17 minutes ago, ragevsuall17 said: Not just RBs... all contracts are being structured that way... its the standard for the most part (Kirk Cousins contract aside). Put all the guaranteed money in the first 2 years, and make it year to year after that. The only penalties teams would carry are any amounts of the SB that were prorated... they don't need to pay out anymore, but it has to count against the cap. 35M G for Henry when Bell got 28M last year... I wouldn't do it. I'm looking more at 22M, although 24M would be ok. Henry to me is not on the same level of the Bells and Gurleys and Barkleys as true 3 down backs. And while Henry's been durable in his career... will he be able to hold up for 2 years if we keep using him the way we have (you're looking at close to 400 carries the past 17 games, including last year's stretch to close the year). Bell & Henry too different cases Bell has a history of failed drug tests plus injuries & seasons he had over 350 + touches & I believe he’s 28. Henry is 25 with no wear & tear he’s only been a starter for 2 years. Your logic makes sense but you can bet he’s going to be looking for 30-35 mill guaranteed he has to get paid & strike while he has leverage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.