Jump to content

BDL Discussion Thread 2020


TedLavie

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, rackcs said:

I don't see how Ruggs should be a C if that is in fact the pick in question. Ruggs is going anywhere from 11-15 in the draft so it's not a reach. It fits a need too.

Deep receiving class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, rackcs said:

I don't see how Ruggs should be a C if that is in fact the pick in question. Ruggs is going anywhere from 11-15 in the draft so it's not a reach. It fits a need too.

So.. for the record, Ruggs wasnt a C. 2 of them so far have been handed out.. Again I am considering Need as much as talent, if not more. I wont say who got the C's or the B.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rackcs said:

That doesn't mean if you take a player in the range he's in that should be a negative. And the top 3 guys are way above the rest of the class in my opinion.

But realistically there are better talents at other positions  available. However, I've been there. See DK Metcalf

Edited by PR
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PR said:

But realistically there are better talents available. However, I've been there. See DK Metcalf

I don't think there's that many. I've only got 3 guys ahead of him and it's pretty close. I'd say that's acceptable BPA range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rackcs said:

I don't think there's that many. I've only got 3 guys ahead of him and it's pretty close. I'd say that's acceptable BPA range.

At other positions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...