Jump to content

The Everything Giannis Thread (Rumors, Speculation, and Proposals)


resilient part 2

Recommended Posts

Just now, MookieMonstah said:

No he's not, and you're far smarter than this post lets on. You understand ball. You understand the trade market. Giannis leaving and on a 1 year deal is VERY different than a controlled Jayson Tatum. Cut it out lol

We're not talking about 1 year deal Giannis. C'mon. Stay with the conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MookieMonstah said:

lol...so this all started because you said you'd demand Tatum or take a lesser offer. 

What is the similar package? Please, enlighten me. I'm not saying its a guarantee. Giannis could re-sign, Giannis could demand his way to LA or GS, Giannis could hate Boston and say he won't sign an extension...but all those things aside, who beats that offer?

-OKC could build an offer around SGA and picks

-Philadelphia could build an offer around Simmons or Embiid

-Denver could build an offer around Murray

-Golden State could build an offer around #2 and their future Minnesota 1st

-New Orleans could build an offer around Ingram

-Phoenix could build an offer around Ayton and Bridges

1 minute ago, beekay414 said:

You're basically telling me that Tatum is on an even level as Giannis by saying they can't even ask for him. That, right there, is what's laughable.

Would you have laughed at San Antonio if they asked for Giannis a couple years ago?

Edited by seminoles1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, seminoles1 said:

-OKC could build an offer around SGA and picks

-Philadelphia could build an offer around Simmons or Embiid

-Denver could build an offer around Murray

-Golden State could build an offer around #2 and their future Minnesota 1st

-New Orleans could build an offer around Ingram

-Phoenix could build an offer around Ayton and Bridges

Would you have laughed at San Antonio if they asked for Giannis a couple years ago?

Yes. Yes he wouldve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, seminoles1 said:

Would you have laughed at San Antonio if they asked for Giannis a couple years ago?

With a Kawhi extension? No. I wouldn't have done it but I wouldn't have laughed it off either. It's a reasonable ask when you're trading a bonafide superstar with control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, seminoles1 said:

Okay. Do you think OKC would have laughed at Cleveland if they asked for Durant in 2010?

Tatum's not Durant either lol and I'm a big time Tatum guy. 

But, no, you don't ******* laugh off an ask for someone like that. That's the point. You tell them no but laughing them off is absurd. It's LeBron/Giannis. Not Anthony Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 49er pride said:

so then why would it work for a better player in a similar situation? 

Like I've said already, thats probably the best offer they realistically get. Jaylen Brown probably the best singular player they're going to be offered. Lakers offer blew Celtics offer out of the water with no Tatum in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...