Scoundrel Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, Jlash said: Since when do decoys tie the lead for their position group in snaps and targets? Seems like a weird strategy. And Counselor made him the focal point of his passing attack this week. I stand by the call. Who knows he was open quite a bit and they didn’t go to him. 🤷🏼♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 Oh you are right completely right, slipped my mind the deep shot he was completely open for six and Carr threw an awful ball. Luckily Ryan is better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 9 minutes ago, Counselor said: Who knows he was open quite a bit and they didn’t go to him. 🤷🏼♂️ 6 minutes ago, Counselor said: Oh you are right completely right, slipped my mind the deep shot he was completely open for six and Carr threw an awful ball. Luckily Ryan is better Bro I'm not knocking how he played or how he was used yesterday. I'm just not going to allow one person who didn't see the game to push the narrative that he was injured for the game and I wasted Ward on him. He played all game, he just wasn't effective way he was used. That's all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 5 minutes ago, Jlash said: Bro I'm not knocking how he played or how he was used yesterday. I'm just not going to allow one person who didn't see the game to push the narrative that he was injured for the game and I wasted Ward on him. He played all game, he just wasn't effective way he was used. That's all. It would be worse if he was injured and that is why he wasn’t effective and I was trying to play him because injuries before games count in this. If Ward does erase him let’s say. I like my other options. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 Just now, Jlash said: Bro I'm not knocking how he played or how he was used yesterday. I'm just not going to allow one person who didn't see the game to push the narrative that he was injured for the game and I wasted Ward on him. He played all game, he just wasn't effective way he was used. That's all. You're really tunneling on the irrelevant part of my post. I considered him ineffective - whether it was the right reasons or not behind it doesn't matter. Sacramento best receiver is, imho, Gallup and you'd have had better success, again in my opinion, putting ward on him and dennard on Ruggs. You disagree with that that's fine - it's my vote after all. Now I will stop with the back and forth because it's incredibly annoying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Counselor said: It would be worse if he was injured and that is why he wasn’t effective and I was trying to play him because injuries before games count in this. If Ward does erase him let’s say. I like my other options. That's my whole point. I'm fine with using my best CB on the guy you want to be the focal point of your offense. The rest is up for everyone else to determine. 8 minutes ago, TedLavie said: You're really tunneling on the irrelevant part of my post. I considered him ineffective - whether it was the right reasons or not behind it doesn't matter. Sacramento best receiver is, imho, Gallup and you'd have had better success, again in my opinion, putting ward on him and dennard on Ruggs. You disagree with that that's fine - it's my vote after all. Now I will stop with the back and forth because it's incredibly annoying. Ruggs is a high 4.2 guy. Ward is a low 4.3 guy. Boyd is a high 4.5 guy, Dennard is a low 4.5 guy. If I put Dennard on Ruggs people on here would roast me mercilessly and you don't stop a speed guy with an average speed guy. I matched athletes with athletes here. edit: tl;dr putting your slowest corner on your opponents faster receiver isn't good. And again, he made Ruggs the focal point of his offense despite who anyone feels is the better player and I'm 100% of with keeping Ward on him. We can be done now. Edited September 22, 2020 by Jlash 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 22 minutes ago, Jlash said: That's my whole point. I'm fine with using my best CB on the guy you want to be the focal point of your offense. The rest is up for everyone else to determine. Ruggs is a high 4.2 guy. Ward is a low 4.3 guy. Boyd is a high 4.5 guy, Dennard is a low 4.5 guy. If I put Dennard on Ruggs people on here would roast me mercilessly and you don't stop a speed guy with an average speed guy. I matched athletes with athletes here. edit: tl;dr putting your slowest corner on your opponents faster receiver isn't good. And again, he made Ruggs the focal point of his offense despite who anyone feels is the better player and I'm 100% of with keeping Ward on him. We can be done now. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKillerNacho Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 4 hours ago, TedLavie said: You're really tunneling on the irrelevant part of my post. I considered him ineffective - whether it was the right reasons or not behind it doesn't matter. Sacramento best receiver is, imho, Gallup and you'd have had better success, again in my opinion, putting ward on him and dennard on Ruggs. You disagree with that that's fine - it's my vote after all. Now I will stop with the back and forth because it's incredibly annoying. I stand with TedLavie who shoul di vote for ted? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 7 hours ago, TheKillerNacho said: I stand with TedLavie who shoul di vote for ted? Always vote for Seoul, best team in this subforum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 @TheKillerNacho Id love to hear an explanation for your vote. Especially after implying you were gonna vote the same way as Ted who voted for Sacramento Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKillerNacho Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 Sacramento's offense seemed younger and I wasn't sure if they could deal with Camden's offensive trio of Wilson, Elliott, and Hopkins, mainly. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 10 minutes ago, TheKillerNacho said: Sacramento's offense seemed younger and I wasn't sure if they could deal with Camden's offensive trio of Wilson, Elliott, and Hopkins, mainly. Genuine question here, did you read the gameplan? Thank you for responding Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKillerNacho Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 1 minute ago, wwhickok said: Genuine question here, did you read the gameplan? Thank you for responding I skim over them to see if they change my mind 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 1 hour ago, wwhickok said: @TheKillerNacho Id love to hear an explanation for your vote. Especially after implying you were gonna vote the same way as Ted who voted for Sacramento I'd be more worried if he just voted based on the way Ted did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 3 minutes ago, Jlash said: I'd be more worried if he just voted based on the way Ted did. Likewise. But I felt it was fair to ask for his thought process 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.