Leader Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 1 minute ago, Packerraymond said: Not a fan of using a 1st on a guy that the scheme opens up.....London is unfortunately probably higher on the board than I'd like due to his size, but give me Wilson, Olave, Williams, Burks or Pickens over him. He's a guy I'd happily take at 53, who won't be at 53 so not someone I want. This ^ in a nutshell. I was thinking this: "London is unfortunately probably higher on the board than I'd like due to his size" while watching videos of the guy - but wondering if there might be more naturally explosive WRs available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 14 minutes ago, Old Guy said: That way we would have 3 rookie WR's who Rodgers won't throw the ball too. Brilliant idea! 😉 It is...if he wants the MVP Trifecta....he'll have to throw to the rookies! LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 14 minutes ago, CWood21 said: I'm all for London if he's there at 22. But if he tests well, he won't be. And if he doesn't...you don't want him at 22. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 Another factor with London is that he's only 20 years old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 4 minutes ago, packfanfb said: And if he doesn't...you don't want him at 22. If he doesn't test well, maybe he is there at 28 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 6 minutes ago, packfanfb said: And if he doesn't...you don't want him at 22. Nope. Still would love to have him. He's WR1 for me by a pretty strong margin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 2 minutes ago, squire12 said: If he doesn't test well, maybe he is there at 28 Either way, don't see Gute drafting a bad athlete in the 1st round. All depends on what those numbers end up being. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 16 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Not a fan of using a 1st on a guy that the scheme opens up. Like a basketball player that needs screens to get his shot and can't create one off the dribble. London is unfortunately probably higher on the board than I'd like due to his size, but give me Wilson, Olave, Williams, Burks or Pickens over him. He's a guy I'd happily take at 53, who won't be at 53 so not someone I want. Think you might want to revisit some tape of his if you think he's scheme dependent. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 5 minutes ago, beekay414 said: Another factor with London is that he's only 20 years old. So is Jameson. Would be real interesting to see if Gute would take him knowing it's going to be a while before he's back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 1 minute ago, packfanfb said: So is Jameson. Would be real interesting to see if Gute would take him knowing it's going to be a while before he's back. Don't think Jameson gets past any of the Eagles picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 2 minutes ago, packfanfb said: So is Jameson. Would be real interesting to see if Gute would take him knowing it's going to be a while before he's back. Legitimately asking, has Gute really had the opportunity to draft a player early with significant medical concerns? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 Just now, CWood21 said: Legitimately asking, has Gute really had the opportunity to draft a player early with significant medical concerns? Simmons? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 1 minute ago, CWood21 said: Legitimately asking, has Gute really had the opportunity to draft a player early with significant medical concerns? Was he the one that passed on Simmons? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 4 minutes ago, packfanfb said: So is Jameson. Would be real interesting to see if Gute would take him knowing it's going to be a while before he's back. Jameson @22 - London @ 28. I'm done. Let me know when it's over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 26, 2022 Share Posted March 26, 2022 Just now, beekay414 said: Was he the one that passed on Simmons? Yeah, but if you believed in Gary like they apparently did, it wouldn't be too crazy to pass on him. I'll count it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts