Scoundrel Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 9 minutes ago, swoosh said: Should we put you out of your misery now? Or do you prefer to be alive for another end game? Do whatever you wish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasonwbantle Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Scoundrel said: Hokiehigh Has he posted? I’m fine with targeting inactives. I assume they are in scum chat discord if they won’t respond. Hokiehigh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOUCAN Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 Is hokiehigh fresh meat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOUCAN Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 49 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: Do whatever you wish I wish you live forever. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 4 minutes ago, JoshstraDaymus said: I wish you live forever. Ditto friend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Orca Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 8 hours ago, JoshstraDaymus said: Yellowstone is a show and not just a park? The Volcano is more interesting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 I'm conflicted here. Is it possible that inactives are being deliberately inactive because they're scum? Sure. Is it also possible that they're not scum? I think so. Is it equally possible that the people suggesting we should focus on inactives are really scum attempting to shift the attention off of themselves and onto known town? It's possible. Is it then possible that the person suggesting we focus on people focusing on inactives is really scum attempting to do exactly what he's accusing others of doing just two sentences before this? Yeah, I guess that's also possible. So, yes, I'm conflicted. And bad at math. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said: I'm conflicted here. Is it possible that inactives are being deliberately inactive because they're scum? Sure. Is it also possible that they're not scum? I think so. Is it equally possible that the people suggesting we should focus on inactives are really scum attempting to shift the attention off of themselves and onto known town? It's possible. Is it then possible that the person suggesting we focus on people focusing on inactives is really scum attempting to do exactly what he's accusing others of doing just two sentences before this? Yeah, I guess that's also possible. So, yes, I'm conflicted. And bad at math. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swoosh Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 1 minute ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said: I'm conflicted here. Is it possible that inactives are being deliberately inactive because they're scum? Sure. Is it also possible that they're not scum? I think so. Is it equally possible that the people suggesting we should focus on inactives are really scum attempting to shift the attention off of themselves and onto known town? It's possible. Is it then possible that the person suggesting we focus on people focusing on inactives is really scum attempting to do exactly what he's accusing others of doing just two sentences before this? Yeah, I guess that's also possible. So, yes, I'm conflicted. And bad at math. All equally possible indeed, but I do agree with voting inactives early, with all things equal. Voting them now does not mean I'll necessarily keep my vote on them, but the goal is to draw them out. I do find who jumps on bandgwagon votes interesting. Runaway votes on day one are never good, IMO. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 7 minutes ago, swoosh said: All equally possible indeed, but I do agree with voting inactives early, with all things equal. Voting them now does not mean I'll necessarily keep my vote on them, but the goal is to draw them out. I do find who jumps on bandgwagon votes interesting. Runaway votes on day one are never good, IMO. Something scum would say as their team purposely avoids the vote trains Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swoosh Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 7 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: Something scum would say as their team purposely avoids the vote trains I'm on the bandwagon myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 5 minutes ago, swoosh said: I'm on the bandwagon myself. Who is the bandwagon on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swoosh Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 2 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: Who is the bandwagon on Matts and Hokie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, swoosh said: Matts and Hokie Weren’t you the first vote on hokie? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.