Packerraymond Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 Well we’re two weeks out, here’s my best prediction at a mock using the tendencies we’ve seen Gute and his staff show us over their prior 4 drafts. Round 1 (22): TRADE : Packers send picks #22 and #59 to NYJ for picks #35 and #38 - Feel like we’ll wish the Raiders picked somewhere from 17-20 on draft night as I could see Olave, Williams, Penning and the remainder of the “tier 2’s” go off the board from 15-20 right in front of us and we’ll be left with the fresh crop of tier 3’s all evenly graded. The Jets should want to jump up to sure up their secondary and grab a CB or Hill here. We’ll take 2 stabs in the early 2nd . Round 1 (28): Treylon Burks 6’2 225 WR (Age 22.10) School: Arkansas This pick will come down to Burks and Pickens IMO. Both have elite size for the position and are top of the line athletes, both are younger prospects. The deciding factor IMO will be versatility, do the Packers feel Burks can be an X/Z as well as a big slot ? If the answer is yes, I think you have to grade him higher, if no, you take Pickens. I think Burks can play outside, he was clocked at 22+ MPH, he’s got ball skills, he’s got length and strength. Real weakness right now I would say is polish to his route running, but you can line him up anywhere and scheme him open while he works on that. LaFleur can look at how his buddy uses Deebo and get a lot of idea with Burks, I think he could become a more versatile weapon than even Davante was, probably not ever the pure receiver, but as a weapon itself may come close. Round 2 (35): Perrion Winfrey 6’3.5 290 DL (Age 21.70) School: Oklahoma Listening to Jerry Montgomery is the driving factor for this pick. He recognizes that he probably has all the run hogs he needs in Clark, Reed, Slaton and to an extent Lowry. However he probably really only feels comfortable with Clark and hopefully Lowry in the rush packages. Lowry and Reed are FA’s next year and a big season from either probably prices us out from them. It’s time to invest in a premium player on the DL. Winfrey has explosion to go with competitive juice. He dominated the Senior Bowl and might have gone higher than this if he didn’t tweak a hammy on run #1 at the Combine. He’ll fit in right away as DL # 4/5 this year, do some rushing while getting acclimated to the pro game and eventually be the cog next to Clark we’ve wanted for awhile. Round 2 (38): Cameron Thomas 6’4 267 EDGE (Age 22.30) School: San Diego State We’ll see where Berry truly stands on EDGE players in this draft if we take one high. There’s some heavier, more versatile guys like Thomas, Jackson and Paschal and then there are lighter EDGE only juice guys like Mafe, Arnold E, and Bonitto who all could be round 2 or 3 picks. I think he’ll stick with what works here and go for the power players who can set an edge and kick inside in rush packages. Thomas was #2 in CFB in tackles for a DL and #2 is TFL, to go along with 12 sacks. He’s played 0T, 3T, 5T and 7T and had varying degrees of success with them all. Came in sub 7 seconds in the 3 cone which is a big predicator in pass rush success. Biggest concerns are lack of length (32 ¾” arms) and the fact that he didn’t run a 40 in the entire cycle. Overall I think he has a chance to be a lot better than some of the round 1 rushers. Round 2 (53): Greg Dulcich 6’4 243 TE (Age 22.10) School: UCLA At #53 the Packers may have their choice of all the TE’s in the draft, my bet is Dulcich is #1 on their board. I could see Jelani Woods here, but his age (almost 24) probably grades him more like a 3-4 round pick on our board. Dulcich is a clone of Tonyan to me, perfect fit for stretching the seam, adequate as a blocker with decent effort. TE is another position where next season we have next to no one under contract, we’ve kicked cash down the road and if Tonyan comes out and has a nice year, he’ll most likely be paid elsewhere. Dulcich should be a guy who can replace him then, while getting acclimated to the offense this year. Round 3: Nick Cross 6’0 212 S (Age 20.63) School: Maryland Safety is another position where next off-season will be rough. Both Amos and Savage will be up (if we don’t exercise his 5 th year), my guess do to age is that we want to extend Savage and let Amos go, but that will depend on performance. If Savage is the player he was post Vikings game last year, he’ll probably be looking for a new home. I think he’ll build on the year he had in 2020 and the beginning of ’21 and earn an extension. Thus we look for more of a SS body. Cross is young, explosive and assignment sound, a lot like young Amos. He’ll get a year to soak in the defense while being S #3 and a core ST player, then gets his shot as the guy alongside Savage in ’23. Round 4: Luke Goedeke 6’5 312 OG/RT (Age 23.40) School: Central Michigan Goedeke is a WI native who started as a DIII TE and then transferred out to CMU and converted to OL. He’s a very fluid mover and has everything you like in an OT, except for his 32 ¼” arms. I think he can be a Billy Turner type player and be an above average RT, but I think he could be even better at OG. Either way outside of his age (which is far less important on day 3) he has everything you look for in a Packer OL pick, college OT experience, versatility, above average agility drills. Round 4: Matt Waletzko 6’7.5 312 OT (Age 22.40) School: North Dakota Think Waletzko is being slept on a bit by the national pundits and wouldn’t surprise me at all if he snuck into pick 60-90 range on day 2 due to his tools. You’ve got 36” arms and plus agility drills to work with. You can start him as LT from day 1 and hope the tools play. Like all long-limbed, smaller school guys, Waletzko is a year or two in a pro weight room away from being able to be trusted as a starter, but everything you want to see is there. Round 5: Dane Belton 6’0 205 DB (Age 21.40) School: Iowa Hard not to see Micah Hyde when you watch Belton. Slot/S versatility, ST potential, ball production, above average athlete. Not sure if Belton is a long-term slot or safety at the NFL level, but we have a use for both. Think he’s a day 1 core ST player and a definite shot to be a long-term player in the nickel/dime. Round 7: Samari Toure 6’0 191 WR (Age 24.10) School: Nebraska Toure is a grad transfer from Montana. He produced there, he produced at Nebraska, he was good in the college All-Star circuit, he ran 4.44 and went 6.77 in the cone. There’s some tools there to work with. Bit older and needs to get much stronger, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Toure is a useful NFL player that sees a 2nd contract. Round 7: Devin Harper 6’0 234 ILB (Age 23.96) School: Oklahoma State Productive player in a major conference, went sub 4.5, 40+” and sub 7.00, got some tools to maybe develop as a dime backer while he looks to make the team on ST. Round 7: Sam Webb 6’0 204 CB (Age 23.95) School: Missouri Western Jumped a 42 ½” which might be the highest I’ve seen this draft class, has some ball production and blocked 2 kicks this year on specials, seems like the kind of guy you want to wrap up in the late 7 th so you don’t have to recruit him as a UDFA. Post Draft Additions:WR Sammy Watkins (1/8 with 1 void year and 4m of the 8 as NLTBE bonuses) This feels a lot like the Campbell signing, he's produced, but also struggled with health and consistency. Everything is on the table if he puts it together. Worked with both LaFleur and Vrabel in the past. WR Jalen Reagor (TRADE for 2023 conditional draft pick): Cobb is in his last year here, between Amari or Reagor I feel like you have two smaller guys who packed on too much muscle to “ready” themselves for the pro game. Hopefully one of them “gets” it and becomes the long-term slot/gadget player while the other finds a home elsewhere. WR room entering camp : Watkins, Lazard, Burks, Cobb, Rodgers, Reagor, Toure, Winfree, Blair, Gafford, UDFA’s 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 Give me Pitre in the 2nd instead of Dulcich and then Ruckert instead of Cross and we have a deal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted April 14, 2022 Author Share Posted April 14, 2022 4 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Give me Pitre in the 2nd instead of Dulcich and then Ruckert instead of Cross and we have a deal. Pitre's going top 40. I have him #31 on my board. I whole heartedly agree with this if he would be available at 53, I just don't see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 This will make no sense, but I don't like Burks but I just can't decide exactly why. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted April 14, 2022 Author Share Posted April 14, 2022 1 minute ago, Norm said: This will make no sense, but I don't like Burks but I just can't decide exactly why. Probably cause you can only handle one WR with elite eyes on the team. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brit Pack Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 Oh man!!! I had been working on my masterpiece mock draft over the last few days and it was in essence this!!! Trade back of the 22nd pick, I would have taken Pickens, but Thomas and Winfrey are my guys in the second round. Conflicted now whether I should share my lifes work 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 1 minute ago, Packerraymond said: Probably cause you can only handle one WR with elite eyes on the team. NVM I'm a fan now. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuckyIrish23 Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 This reminds me of a Ted Thompson type draft. I would feel somewhat disappointed with this draft; however, wouldn’t be surprised if it turned out just okay. Besides Cameron Thomas, I feel that majority of your early picks would have just average careers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted April 14, 2022 Author Share Posted April 14, 2022 1 minute ago, LuckyIrish23 said: This reminds me of a Ted Thompson type draft. I would feel somewhat disappointed with this draft; however, wouldn’t be surprised if it turned out just okay. Besides Cameron Thomas, I feel that majority of your early picks would have just average careers. Ted Thomspon was a wizard, so I take that as a compliment. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 17 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Pitre's going top 40. I have him #31 on my board. I whole heartedly agree with this if he would be available at 53, I just don't see it. I'd also take Brisker there despite his age. It's Hall-Pitre-Brisker-Cross for me in terms of safeties after Hamilton. If I can't get one of those guys in the 2nd, then I'm good with Cross. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 16 minutes ago, Norm said: This will make no sense, but I don't like Burks but I just can't decide exactly why. Are you a member of PETA? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgwingman Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 15 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Probably cause you can only handle one WR with elite eyes on the team. What WR on the Packers already has elite eyes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jleisher Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 I think with two first rd picks, a trade up is more called for then a trade down. I could see a trade down in the second rd into the third. That's just me, if this was the draft results, I could live with it. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 19 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Probably cause you can only handle one WR with elite eyes on the team. He's got Cobb eyes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 29 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Are you a member of PETA? I'm now afraid to ask why you asked me this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.