AlexGreen#20 Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 2 minutes ago, cannondale said: IF there was time, which there wasn't. Hence all the checkdowns How long does this idiot need to see a rotating Safety? That's where his eyes should be AT THE SNAP. As soon as the Safety moves, Adams route is dead. That should be so instantaneous, that it's not even a read. And let's even say that they get him a couple of times on the shift, bruh, what's the excuse for the next 30 snaps for not having the counter in the front of his head? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 1 minute ago, AlexGreen#20 said: How long does this idiot need to see a rotating Safety? That's where his eyes should be AT THE SNAP. As soon as the Safety moves, Adams route is dead. That should be so instantaneous, that it's not even a read. And let's even say that they get him a couple of times on the shift, bruh, what's the excuse for the next 30 snaps for not having the counter in the front of his head? The QB has do go through the progressions whether rolled coverage or not. Whether you would assume (cant do it) it may be a dead route or not. It's a timing issue engrained by 100's of reps. IT's a timing and footwork issue integrated into the route concepts. Just because you want him to pull off read No.1 early, doesn't make read No.2 open any faster. Not much you can do when your first read is covered and you either check it down or take a sack. That was the issue in the SF game. My outlandish idea that MLF should have had a set of plays to counter this was my main point, and will continue to be my point. When 90% of your plays had Adams as the first read, that is a design fail waiting to happen. And it did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 15 minutes ago, cannondale said: It's all about context. When responding to "Rodgers being unable to recognize rolled coverage" there is little to say Buddy, this was your idiotic supposition. Not mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 (edited) 29 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said: Buddy, this was your idiotic supposition. Not mine. You said Rodgers can't recognize rolled coverage. That's a ridiculous statement that simply isn't true. One might even call it idiotic. You've hated Rodgers for 3 years. It hasn't aged well. Tossing out statements that are flat out false doesn't help your case Edited June 16, 2022 by cannondale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 27 minutes ago, cannondale said: The QB has do go through the progressions whether rolled coverage or not. Whether you would assume (cant do it) it may be a dead route or not. It's a timing issue engrained by 100's of reps. IT's a timing and footwork issue integrated into the route concepts. Just because you want him to pull off read No.1 early, doesn't make read No.2 open any faster. Not much you can do when your first read is covered and you either check it down or take a sack. That was the issue in the SF game. My outlandish idea that MLF should have had a set of plays to counter this was my main point, and will continue to be my point. When 90% of your plays had Adams as the first read, that is a design fail waiting to happen. And it did. No. He doesn't. The coverage-change, changes the routes that the WRs are running. You think if you've got a play called in which both boundary receivers are running vertical against Cover-1, that they're going to run those dead routes if the defense changes to Cover-2??? That would be idiotic. The QB and the WR making the same post snap read is exactly what makes adapting to the offense, and the QB/WR mind meld so difficult. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 30 minutes ago, cannondale said: You've hated Rodgers for 3 years. It hasn't aged well. Yep, he sure has made me eat crow with an these elite playoff performances . . . Wait. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 1 minute ago, AlexGreen#20 said: Yep, he sure has made me eat crow with an these elite playoff performances . . . Wait. Your pain will be over soon - and you won't have to worry about playoff performances Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 1 minute ago, cannondale said: Your pain will be over soon - and you won't have to worry about playoff performances Maybe, but I think the Packers are in the midst of building a team that can win, post Rodgers. We'll soon find out what life is like without Aaron. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 20 minutes ago, cannondale said: Your pain will be over soon - and you won't have to worry about playoff performances Tell me you're a Rodgers' fan and not a Packers fan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 4 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said: Tell me you're a Rodgers' fan and not a Packers fan. Why can't one be both? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 3 minutes ago, ThatJerkDave said: Why can't one be both? Connotative vs Denotative definitions. In modern parlance, [Player]-fan indicates a person who likes a player more than the team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachbuns Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 54 minutes ago, ThatJerkDave said: Why can't one be both? They can ... if one wants to be. Obviously, some chose not to be both. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 Rodgers does just fine in the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 13 minutes ago, Sandy said: Rodgers does just fine in the playoffs. He stat pads with the best of them for sure. Got to preserve that passer rating Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted June 16, 2022 Share Posted June 16, 2022 30 minutes ago, Sandy said: Rodgers does just fine in the playoffs. Sometimes he's fine ... last year was not "just fine". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.