CriminalMind Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 2 minutes ago, NorthCountryEvo said: Not to get off topic here, but you can't use this logic here but not use this logic in the Keenum thread. yes i can. im comparing 1 whole team to another whole team and both teams have games played which provide a current and fair body of work. see the difference? hope so. try again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDBrocks Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Just now, JDBrocks said: http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/0ap3000000549402/Vikings-Teddy-Bridgewater-finds-Stefon-Diggs-for-25-yards This is one of my all time favorite throws and a reminder of what Teddy brings to the table that none of the other QBs on the roster do. Watching that clip is a reminder of how brutal that offensive line and offense was in general. Three Broncos in the backfield and three OL to block one DL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CriminalMind Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 anyways... zimmer has decided on whose starting vs rams but had this to say: "I haven't sat down and talked to anybody yet, so I'm going to wait until Wednesday," im thinking he wants/needs to talk to Rick. is he telling Rick he making a QB switch? is he telling Rick he wants to continue with Case even though he knows evaluating teddy would be challenging for offseason. let the thinking continue... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nzd07 Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 It's going to be Case, he just wants to throw a little wrinkle at the Rams this week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthCountryEvo Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 31 minutes ago, CriminalMind said: yes i can. im comparing 1 whole team to another whole team and both teams have games played which provide a current and fair body of work. see the difference? hope so. try again The point is that you have to compare one whole team to another whole team when evaluating Bridgewater vs. Keenum. The 2015 Vikings are a different team than the 2017 Vikings, both in talent, players, staff, and philosophy. You can't use the statistical body of work of one player/coach/team vs another without utilizing the context of the surrounding cast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 1 hour ago, Klomp said: The last time Teddy Bridgewater faced a Wade Phillips defense: 27-41, 269 yards, 1 touchdown That doesn't account for the 7 sacks and fumble lost. But yea, Teddy scares me a lot more than Case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingsrule Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 3 minutes ago, jrry32 said: That doesn't account for the 7 sacks and fumble lost. But yea, Teddy scares me a lot more than Case. Nor does it account for a dramatic scheme change and a big upgrade at LT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vike daddy Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 35 minutes ago, Nzd07 said: It's going to be Case, he just wants to throw a little wrinkle at the Rams this week. that would be my guess too. hey, all of us have a 50/50 chance of being right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 1 minute ago, vikingsrule said: Nor does it account for a dramatic scheme change and a big upgrade at LT. That's irrelevant information when we're talking about that game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamRod Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Big game for both teams. Looking forward to this one. You guys have had our number recently. Hoping that can change Sunday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDBrocks Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 4 minutes ago, jrry32 said: That's irrelevant information when we're talking about that game. Right. The relevant part is that Matt Kalil and TJ Clemmings were playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Just now, JDBrocks said: Right. The relevant part is that Matt Kalil and TJ Clemmings were playing. He brought the game up. I did not. I simply added a couple stats that he omitted. It's clear where I stand on the Teddy v. Case issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDBrocks Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 I was just adding some important context We're on the same page Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingsrule Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 2 minutes ago, jrry32 said: He brought the game up. I did not. I simply added a couple stats that he omitted. It's clear where I stand on the Teddy v. Case issue. Ultimately, Shurmur has done a fine job with the offense and is managing to get a lot out of Keenum. We've given up very few sacks, most of them in the first half of the Bears game when Bradford should have been out. The prospect of Teddy in this offense is exciting, I want to see it sooner than later; even if it's not smooth at first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 1 minute ago, vikingsrule said: Ultimately, Shurmur has done a fine job with the offense and is managing to get a lot out of Keenum. We've given up very few sacks, most of them in the first half of the Bears game when Bradford should have been out. The prospect of Teddy in this offense is exciting, I want to see it sooner than later; even if it's not smooth at first. Unfortunately for you, Aaron Donald is hungry, and I told him that Case Keenum has a snickers hidden somewhere on his person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.