Jump to content

Cavaliers Thread: We Somehow Both Don't and Do Suck


LETSGOBROWNIES

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, candyman93 said:

Not sure if we could get him for vet min, but what do you guys think about Dillon Brooks? He’s a complete 180 personality wise from the rest of the roster.

I haven't watched him much outside of when we play them and the playoffs, but it's a no from me.  Not as much because he's an obnoxious heel as he's a complete chucker and I don't think he'll stop chucking just because we have better scoring options.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said:

I haven't watched him much outside of when we play them and the playoffs, but it's a no from me.  Not as much because he's an obnoxious heel as he's a complete chucker and I don't think he'll stop chucking just because we have better scoring options.

This. I actually like what he’d bring as far being an agitator, but offensively he’s no good.

Also, you’ve got to know who to agitate.  LeBron isn’t and has never been the dude to try to rile up.  Idiotic move tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, candyman93 said:

Not sure if we could get him for vet min, but what do you guys think about Dillon Brooks? He’s a complete 180 personality wise from the rest of the roster.

After watching these soft pansy’s I don’t think we’re in any position to turn down any toughness. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t understand how the cap works in the NBA, but I would trade Allen for either a good outside shooter or the best pick/s we can get for him.

Then sign Draymond Green to play the 4, Move Mobley to centre and get him in the gym.

I don’t know how possible this is. I follow pretty closely but like I said don’t understand how the cap works 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/2/2023 at 1:14 PM, candyman93 said:

Not sure if we could get him for vet min, but what do you guys think about Dillon Brooks? He’s a complete 180 personality wise from the rest of the roster.

Gross. He's a piece of garbage and sucks at basketball. I'd sooner bring in Draymond than I would Brooks.

...but no to either. We don't need to bring in a "tough guy" for tough guy's sake. We still need offensively talented players to come in here, because as we saw, we have no scoring unless Mitchell/Garland go nuclear hot. Bringing in a "goon" does nothing to solve that issue whatsoever.

If the high paid guys we have right now aren't going to grow a pair after getting shellacked in the playoffs, we are doomed anyways.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, BetterCallSaul said:

Gross. He's a piece of garbage and sucks at basketball. I'd sooner bring in Draymond than I would Brooks.

...but no to either. We don't need to bring in a "tough guy" for tough guy's sake. We still need offensively talented players to come in here, because as we saw, we have no scoring unless Mitchell/Garland go nuclear hot. Bringing in a "goon" does nothing to solve that issue whatsoever.

If the high paid guys we have right now aren't going to grow a pair after getting shellacked in the playoffs, we are doomed anyways.

Also, there’s a difference between a “tough guy” and a tough guy. 
 

Brooks is the former imo.  He’s just a dirty player with a big mouth. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...