Jump to content

53 Man Roster thread


Old Guy

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, CWood21 said:

If Gute (and by extension LaFleur) felt the need to trade for Malik Willis, that should tell you enough about what they think of Pratt.

Yes Pratt isn't ready to be #2 yet.  Has raw talent but needs to be developed.  Think we all saw that.  He does have an NFL arm and a high ceiling though.  Again you are probably right he'll end up on the PS.  I'd just hate to see him poached.  Give the kid another year and he'll be ready to assume that #2 role. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mazrimiv said:

I'm not sure that Dillard being cut would even rate as a surprise.  Fans have been wanting to leave him off the 53 for weeks.

Agree that really isn't a surprise, don't think the Packers want to guarantee his salary for the year. Could see him cut and brought back a few weeks down the line though. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, HighCalebR said:

Telfort did have a pretty nice showing.. would they put 2 redshirt OL on the roster?

Wouldn't this actually by 3? You'd have the six who we could trust that could play, then Monk, Telford and somebody else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, R T said:

Agree that really isn't a surprise, don't think the Packers want to guarantee his salary for the year. Could see him cut and brought back a few weeks down the line though. 

Doesn't he have an injury? If he is waived injured then that means the Packers won't be able to re-sign him for six weeks plus the length of the settlement.

If that's the case then they only got two options. Keep him on the roster and fully guarantee his base salary or cut him completely and look elsewhere.

There's also the fact he's a LT only and not much of a swing tackle. That will definitely count against him.

Zach Kruse's take is looking much more likely.

Edited by Chili
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Old Guy said:

Wouldn't this actually by 3? You'd have the six who we could trust that could play, then Monk, Telford and somebody else. 

Telfort youd be relying on to play, hes a problem(good way) in the run game while being at least decent in pro. Id assume the two would be Monk/Glover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Chili said:

Doesn't he have an injury? If he is waived injured then that means the Packers won't be able to re-sign him for six weeks plus the length of the settlement.

If that's the case then they only got two options. Keep him on the roster and fully guarantee his base salary or cut him completely and look elsewhere.

There's also the fact he's a LT only and not much of a swing tackle. That will definitely count against him.

Zach Kruse's take is looking much more likely.

Yeah, the injury is what throws a wrench in the Dillard situation.  I am not sure exactly how that works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, packfanfb said:

First pin drops.

Toure had an intriguing first season. He never looked like he’d be very good, but there were hopes he could play as a depth piece. He was not better at anything than the other guys. I wish him well and he would be welcome on the PS. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Mazrimiv said:

I'm not sure that Dillard being cut would even rate as a surprise.  Fans have been wanting to leave him off the 53 for weeks.

Ha true. Id be a little surprised though. After a very rough start he settled in pretty well and hes our best athlete on the OL, touts some positional flexibility and has real game experience.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mazrimiv said:

Yeah, the injury is what throws a wrench in the Dillard situation.  I am not sure exactly how that works.

Do we even know how serious the injury is though? Was he just held out to be on the safe side?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...