VonKarman Posted Wednesday at 10:22 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 10:22 AM 19 hours ago, Old Guy said: Would Doubs and a second get us Mad Maxx Crosby? A first and Doubs wouldn't get us Crosby. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted Wednesday at 06:09 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:09 PM Some of us are already there, but for those who aren't, Stokes just isn't a good CB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted Wednesday at 06:11 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:11 PM Nixon v Valentine on the boundary will be interesting to watch going forward. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted Wednesday at 06:21 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:21 PM From JSO Quote Rookie safeties Javon Bullard and Evan Williams have played so well that against the Arizona Cardinals they were essentially full-time players in nickel personnel, with Bullard in the slot and Williams at safety. They played together on all but one of the Packers’ 36 snaps in nickel in the 34-13 victory Sunday. With Bullard in the slot, Keisean Nixon became a full-time player at outside cornerback Sunday — he played all 58 defensive snaps in this game, all but one at outside cornerback. That’s a big change from the first month of the season, when Nixon played exclusively in the slot. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted Wednesday at 06:22 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:22 PM 10 minutes ago, incognito_man said: Nixon v Valentine on the boundary will be interesting to watch going forward. I still think Stokes is going to be the guy. Also, I'm very aware I could be wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted Wednesday at 06:23 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:23 PM 2 minutes ago, Mazrimiv said: From JSO I saw Stokes on the field, seemed like a lot. Where the heck did he play? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted Wednesday at 06:25 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:25 PM (edited) 1 minute ago, Old Guy said: I saw Stokes on the field, seemed like a lot. Where the heck did he play? Stokes played 16 snaps vs ARI, I assume he's the 6th DB in dime. Edited Wednesday at 06:26 PM by Mazrimiv Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted Wednesday at 06:26 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:26 PM 16 hours ago, Uffdaswede said: Passrushwise I console myself with the rationalization that the dawgs may have been chained down while they faced some very mobile quarterbacks. I appreciated the heck out of not seeing our defense carved up by the legs of running quarterbacks thus far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted Wednesday at 06:27 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:27 PM (edited) 4 minutes ago, Old Guy said: I saw Stokes on the field, seemed like a lot. Where the heck did he play? From Acme Quote Green Bay did give Alexander some snaps off late with the game out of reach, which is when Stokes got the bulk of his limited workload. Edited Wednesday at 06:29 PM by Mazrimiv Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted Wednesday at 06:30 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:30 PM 6 minutes ago, Old Guy said: I saw Stokes on the field, seemed like a lot. Where the heck did he play? He was burned for a relatively easy TD that Murray just flat out choked on. That's when I saw him. That kid (Stokes) played with a whole lot more confidence when he was a rookie and free from injury. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted Wednesday at 06:32 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:32 PM 21 minutes ago, incognito_man said: Nixon v Valentine on the boundary will be interesting to watch going forward. I thought nixon was playing mostly slot? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted Wednesday at 06:33 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:33 PM 2 minutes ago, vegas492 said: He was burned for a relatively easy TD that Murray just flat out choked on. That's when I saw him. That kid (Stokes) played with a whole lot more confidence when he was a rookie and free from injury. I'm holding out hope, fading, for that version of the kid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted Wednesday at 06:33 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:33 PM 24 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Some of us are already there, but for those who aren't, Stokes just isn't a good CB. Stokes has never been the same since the injury in Detroit, lost a lot of flexion in his game. Has to be concern for Hutch as his injury was even worse. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted Wednesday at 06:36 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:36 PM Just now, Packerraymond said: Stokes has never been the same since the injury in Detroit, lost a lot of flexion in his game. Has to be concern for Hutch as his injury was even worse. Yeah, he's simply not the same player today that he was as a rookie. Unfortunate part of the game. Stokes is looking like a promising player who had his career derailed by injuries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted Wednesday at 06:37 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:37 PM 3 minutes ago, skibrett15 said: I thought nixon was playing mostly slot? This was true until the ARI game, where he played exclusively outside. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.